Reference eligibility: eligible — Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.
This is a retained audit record, not an eligible reference example. Inspect source eligibility.
administration/project coordination / svc-20
Maintain an evidence-informed roadmap
Teams collaboratively update a roadmap that connects a service vision to measurable iterations.
documented-procedure · · Source account, not a validated implementation
What goes in
- Vision
- User research
- Performance analysis
What comes out
- Prioritized roadmap
Documented sequence
Order described in the source account; not a sequence between pattern families.
- Start with the service vision.
- Use research and performance evidence with stakeholders.
- Define iteration objectives and progress measures.
- Order work using a transparent prioritization method.
- Maintain a master version.
- Review and update regularly.
Checks described
- Keep alternate versions synchronized.
- Use clear language.
What changes with context
- GDS describes at least quarterly iteration.
- Security or political sensitivity can restrict publication.
Shared patterns · provisional interpretation
-
Assemble grounded evidence
Distributed source material → traceable retrieval, synthesis, or a decision-ready evidence packet
-
Compare options for a decision
Options and contextual criteria → reasoned ranking, recommendation, or recorded authorized choice
-
Coordinate commitments to closure
An objective involving people or teams → accountable next actions, handoffs, tracking, and agreed closure
Fit: mapped. Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested
Could this transfer?
Hypothetical: A nonprofit could map service improvements against observed beneficiary needs.
Limit: Do not treat provisional roadmap dates as delivery guarantees.
Evidence limits and unknowns
- Specific prioritization method
- Outcome results
Source eligibility and effectiveness
Allowed use: process reference with explicit limits . Source eligibility is not proof of effectiveness, safety or transferability.
Review attribution: AI-assisted source review · 2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00.
- Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.
- No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.
- Specific prioritization method
- Outcome results
- Do not treat provisional roadmap dates as delivery guarantees.
Source and dates
Developing a roadmap ↗ · Government service manual
- Published
- 2017-11-16
- Updated
- Unknown
- Checked (UTC)
- 2026-10-18T03:00:27Z
Original GOV.UK page explicitly labels Published: 16 November 2017. No last-updated field appears in retrieved text.
verified published only · Date evidence ↗