Reference eligibility: eligible — Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.
This is a retained audit record, not an eligible reference example. Inspect source eligibility.
product / comm-12
Product Talk opportunity-to-assumption discovery
A team links an intended outcome to observed needs, alternative solutions, and tests of their risky assumptions.
documented-procedure · conventional-workflow · Source account, not a validated implementation
What goes in
- Outcome
- Customer interview stories
What comes out
- Opportunity map
- Assumption-test evidence
- Next decision
Documented sequence
Order described in the source account; not a sequence between pattern families.
- Establish customer hypothesis, outcome, and initial interviews
- Map observed opportunities
- Select a target opportunity
- Generate solutions
- Choose three alternatives
- Identify and prioritize assumptions
- Test risky assumptions across alternatives
- Refine, replace, or abandon options
Checks described
- Do not invent opportunities without interviews
- Keep revising the map as interviews continue
What changes with context
- Continuous discovery; several initial interviews are prerequisites, not a sufficient final sample
- Evidence may justify abandoning an entire target opportunity
Shared patterns · provisional interpretation
-
Investigate needs through inquiry
Uncertain needs or situation → questions, responses, and a progressively clarified account
-
Compare options for a decision
Options and contextual criteria → reasoned ranking, recommendation, or recorded authorized choice
-
Test alternatives and learn
Hypotheses or alternatives → deliberate test, observed results, and updated selection or next action
Fit: mapped. Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested
Could this transfer?
Hypothetical: a library could compare approaches to reducing catalogue-search frustration by testing their distinct assumptions.
Limit: Qualitative discovery does not by itself estimate population prevalence or prove business impact.
Evidence limits and unknowns
Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings.
- Observed outcomes in a specific implementation
- Test-selection details
Source eligibility and effectiveness
Allowed use: process reference with explicit limits . Source eligibility is not proof of effectiveness, safety or transferability.
Review attribution: AI-assisted source review · 2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00.
- Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.
- No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.
- Observed outcomes in a specific implementation
- Test-selection details
- Qualitative discovery does not by itself estimate population prevalence or prove business impact.
Source and dates
Opportunity Solution Trees: Visualize Your Discovery to Stay Aligned and Drive Outcomes ↗ · Original method author guidance
- Published
- Unknown
- Updated
- Unknown
- Checked (UTC)
- 2026-10-18T03:01:00Z
displayed_article_date_type_unspecified: 2023-12-06
Requested /2016/08/opportunity-solution-tree/ URL redirects to /opportunity-solution-trees/. Current article header shows 06 Dec 2023; it does not label this as original publication or revision. URL-embedded 2016 is not used as date evidence.
verified displayed date type unspecified · Date evidence ↗