[ { "id": "comm-01", "title": "Buffer's search-led tutorial production", "function": "marketing/content", "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/how-to-write-a-blog-post/", "source_title": "How to Write a Blog Post: A Full Breakdown of How We Do it at Buffer", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "marketing/content" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P03" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2024-09-05", "source_type": "First-person practitioner walkthrough", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Peer review", "CMS preview", "SEO-focused posts receive another optimization check" ], "unknowns": [ "Measured causal effect of individual steps", "Editorial rejection rates" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2024-09-05", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/how-to-write-a-blog-post/", "evidence_note": "Article header near title displays Sep 5, 2024. Treated as displayed publication date; no separate update label or original publication history established.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-01", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-02", "title": "Ahrefs page-by-page content audit", "function": "marketing/content", "source_url": "https://ahrefs.com/blog/content-audit/", "source_title": "Follow Our Content Audit Process (Template Included)", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "marketing/content" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P06", "P07" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Practitioner method with worked examples", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Use a comparable competitor when the top result is an unbeatable official page", "Avoid deletion without confidence" ], "unknowns": [ "General effect sizes", "Exact thresholds for each business" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2023-09-15", "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified", "evidence_url": "https://ahrefs.com/blog/content-audit/", "evidence_note": "Article byline displays September 15, 2023, without specifying whether this is original publication or revision. Preserved as an untyped article date rather than guessing.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-02", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-03", "title": "GOV.UK independent publishing review", "function": "marketing/content", "source_url": "https://guidance.publishing.service.gov.uk/publish-update-retire-content/standard-content-types/send-standard-review/", "source_title": "Send standard content types for review", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "marketing/content" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [], "split": "training", "fit": "unmapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Official publishing handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Rendered preview", "Second editor review" ], "unknowns": [ "Reviewer turnaround time", "Review rubric is on a separate page" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://guidance.publishing.service.gov.uk/publish-update-retire-content/standard-content-types/send-standard-review/", "evidence_note": "Original publishing-handbook page was reopened; no publication or last-update label appears in retrieved text. Do not borrow dates from the retired GOV.UK URL or crawl time.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-03", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-04", "title": "Mailchimp single-variable email experiment", "function": "marketing/content", "source_url": "https://mailchimp.com/help/create-ab-tests/", "source_title": "Create an A/B Test", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "marketing/content" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P09", "P03" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Official product procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "For content tests, use clicks rather than opens", "Preview", "Allow response time" ], "unknowns": [ "Sample-specific statistical power", "Independent evaluation of defaults" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://mailchimp.com/help/create-ab-tests/", "evidence_note": "Original Mailchimp help article was reopened and searched for update labels. No page publication/update date established; dates of linked resources or product changes are not page dates.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-04", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-06", "title": "Buffer's AI-assisted glossary construction", "function": "marketing/content", "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/how-we-use-ai-in-content/", "source_title": "How Buffer's Content Team Uses AI", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "marketing/content" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2024-03-14", "source_type": "First-party team practice report", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Human accuracy review is a team-wide policy", "Human editing and added resources" ], "unknowns": [ "Exact production prompt", "Entry-level review evidence", "Whether practice changed later" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2024-03-14", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/how-we-use-ai-in-content/", "evidence_note": "Article header near title displays Mar 14, 2024. Treated as displayed publication date; no separate update label or original publication history established.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-06", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-07", "title": "Basecamp's shaped project pitch", "function": "product", "source_url": "https://basecamp.com/shapeup/1.5-chapter-06", "source_title": "Write the Pitch", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "product" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P03", "P08" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party operating handbook with actual pitch examples", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Annotations make rough sketches understandable", "Colleagues challenge holes" ], "unknowns": [ "Pitch rejection rates", "Independent outcome measurement" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://basecamp.com/shapeup/1.5-chapter-06", "evidence_note": "Original Shape Up chapter was reopened. No chapter publication/update label established. Book publication year cannot be assigned to this living chapter without specific evidence.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-07", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-08", "title": "Intercom's RICE prioritization review", "function": "product", "source_url": "https://www.intercom.com/blog/rice-simple-prioritization-for-product-managers", "source_title": "RICE: Simple prioritization for product managers", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "product" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P07" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2018-01-05", "source_type": "Original practitioner method", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Reconsider implausibly high or low scores" ], "unknowns": [ "Calibration accuracy", "Measured superiority over alternatives" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2018-01-05", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.intercom.com/blog/rice-simple-prioritization-for-product-managers", "evidence_note": "Author byline displays Sean McBride, 5 January 2018. Recorded as displayed publication date; no separate update date found.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-08", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-09", "title": "GitLab's shared-responsibility issue routing", "function": "product", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development/how-we-work/issue-triage/", "source_title": "Issue Triage", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "product" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Public operating handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Explain reassignment reasoning", "Receiving team agrees before relabeling" ], "unknowns": [ "Resolution-rate improvement", "Time spent in disputed ownership" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-07-31", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development/how-we-work/issue-triage/", "evidence_note": "Page footer explicitly says Last modified July 31, 2026 and links commit 5d615813. Original publication not established.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_update_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-09", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-10", "title": "GOV.UK service-retirement transition", "function": "product", "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/retiring-your-service", "source_title": "Retiring your service", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "product" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P11", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2025-08-26 (last updated)", "source_type": "Official service handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Account for direct, API, and assisted access" ], "unknowns": [ "Actual retirement outcomes", "Successor readiness assessment details" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2016-08-04", "updated": "2025-08-26", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/retiring-your-service", "evidence_note": "Updates to this page explicitly labels Published 4 August 2016 and Last updated 26 August 2025; history confirms first publication.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_explicit_publication_and_update" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-10", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-12", "title": "Product Talk opportunity-to-assumption discovery", "function": "product", "source_url": "https://www.producttalk.org/2016/08/opportunity-solution-tree/", "source_title": "Opportunity Solution Trees: Visualize Your Discovery to Stay Aligned and Drive Outcomes", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "product" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P01", "P07", "P09" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Original method author guidance", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Do not invent opportunities without interviews", "Keep revising the map as interviews continue" ], "unknowns": [ "Observed outcomes in a specific implementation", "Test-selection details" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2023-12-06", "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified", "evidence_url": "https://www.producttalk.org/opportunity-solution-trees/", "evidence_note": "Requested /2016/08/opportunity-solution-tree/ URL redirects to /opportunity-solution-trees/. Current article header shows 06 Dec 2023; it does not label this as original publication or revision. URL-embedded 2016 is not used as date evidence.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-12", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-13", "title": "GDS collaborative research analysis", "function": "design/research", "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/analyse-a-research-session", "source_title": "Analyse a research session", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "design/research" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2016-05-24", "source_type": "Official research handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Capture what happened before interpreting", "Use separate note colors for findings and actions" ], "unknowns": [ "Inter-rater agreement", "Treatment of contradictory observations", "Downstream implementation rate" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2016-05-24", "updated": "2016-05-24", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/analyse-a-research-session", "evidence_note": "Updates to this page explicitly labels both publication and last update 24 May 2016; first-publication history matches.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_explicit_publication_and_update" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-13", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-14", "title": "GDS moderated usability session", "function": "design/research", "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/using-moderated-usability-testing", "source_title": "Using moderated usability testing", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "design/research" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P01", "P09" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2017-10-03 (last updated)", "source_type": "Official research handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Pilot instructions", "Consistent task delivery", "Neutral prompts" ], "unknowns": [ "Task-specific success thresholds", "Results from any particular service" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2017-02-21", "updated": "2017-10-03", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/using-moderated-usability-testing", "evidence_note": "Updates to this page explicitly labels Published 21 February 2017 and Last updated 3 October 2017; update history explains the change.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_explicit_publication_and_update" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-14", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-15", "title": "IDEO.org field-learning download", "function": "design/research", "source_url": "https://www.designkit.org/methods/download-your-learnings.html", "source_title": "Download Your Learnings", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "design/research" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P01" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Original organization method guide", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Listen attentively", "Download while experiences remain fresh" ], "unknowns": [ "Formal validation rules", "Later synthesis and decision procedure" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.designkit.org/methods/download-your-learnings.html", "evidence_note": "Original Design Kit method page reopened. No publication/update label established in retrieved text.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-15", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-16", "title": "NN/g open card sorting", "function": "design/research", "source_url": "https://www.nngroup.com/articles/card-sorting-definition/", "source_title": "Card Sorting: Uncover Users' Mental Models", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "design/research" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P01" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Expert-authored method procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Avoid shared wording that mechanically cues grouping", "Pilot clarity" ], "unknowns": [ "Specific dataset and resulting taxonomy", "Implementation effects" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2024-02-02", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.nngroup.com/articles/card-sorting-definition/", "evidence_note": "Author/title block displays February 2, 2024 and 2024-02-02. Recorded as displayed publication date; no separate update date found.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-16", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-17", "title": "IBM user-journey playback", "function": "design/research", "source_url": "https://www.ibm.com/training/enterprise-design-thinking/framework", "source_title": "Enterprise Design Thinking Framework", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "design/research" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P01" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "qualified", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Original organization framework and procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Review the complete journey", "Give participants a voice" ], "unknowns": [ "Formal acceptance thresholds", "Observed release outcomes" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.ibm.com/training/enterprise-design-thinking/framework", "evidence_note": "Original IBM framework page reopened. No page publication/update label established; dates from separate downloadable toolkit assets are not assigned to this page.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-17", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-19", "title": "Atlassian DACI decision record", "function": "leadership/strategy", "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/daci", "source_title": "DACI Decision-Making Framework", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "leadership/strategy", "administration/project coordination" ], "aliases": [ "svc-21" ], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P07", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Official facilitation procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Separate contributor input from final authority", "Record reasons for future reference" ], "unknowns": [ "Whether listed benefits hold in practice", "Escalation when approver is unavailable" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/daci", "evidence_note": "Original DACI play reopened. No publication/update label established. Footer copyright 2025 is not a publication date.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-19", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-20", "title": "Atlassian project premortem", "function": "leadership/strategy", "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/pre-mortem", "source_title": "Pre-mortem project management strategy", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "leadership/strategy" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P08", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Official facilitation procedure with illustrated team examples", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Quantify time or cost where available", "Every commitment gets an owner and deadline" ], "unknowns": [ "Mitigation follow-through", "Measured predictive accuracy" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/pre-mortem", "evidence_note": "Original premortem play reopened. No publication/update label established; timing estimates refer to the workshop, not publication.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-20", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-21", "title": "Nesta theory-of-change construction", "function": "leadership/strategy", "source_url": "https://www.nesta.org.uk/toolkit/theory-change/", "source_title": "Understanding the theory of change model", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "leadership/strategy" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [], "split": "training", "fit": "unmapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Original foundation toolkit", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Make effects specific and evidence-based", "Surface assumptions for testing" ], "unknowns": [ "Source-specific implementation outcomes", "Detailed falsification procedure" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.nesta.org.uk/toolkit/theory-change/", "evidence_note": "Original Nesta toolkit page reopened and checked for date labels. No publication/update date established; footer copyright year is excluded.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-21", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-22", "title": "Outcome Harvesting for strategic learning", "function": "leadership/strategy", "source_url": "https://www.betterevaluation.org/methods-approaches/approaches/outcome-harvesting", "source_title": "Outcome harvesting", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "leadership/strategy" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P05" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Method-developer-contributed evaluation guide", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Observable changes", "Independent knowledgeable sources", "Open questions beyond planned outcomes" ], "unknowns": [ "Application-specific sampling", "Strength of causal inference in a particular harvest" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.betterevaluation.org/methods-approaches/approaches/outcome-harvesting", "evidence_note": "Direct original-page opens returned an internal retrieval error in this pass; search returned original-page text but no page publication/update label. Dates 2012 and 2013 describe a cited external guide, not this page. Date remains unavailable.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "unavailable_retrieval_limited" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-22", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-23", "title": "Zapier's AI proposal pressure-test", "function": "leadership/strategy", "source_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/how-i-ai/ea-ai-workflows-for-meetings-culture-and-strategy", "source_title": "How I AI: Zapier EA Cortney Hickey's 4 AI Workflows for Meeting Prep, Culture Reinforcement, and Strategy", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "leadership/strategy" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P03", "P08" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2025-12-15", "source_type": "Original interview and published demonstration walkthrough", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Context-based comparison" ], "unknowns": [ "Full prompt", "False-positive critiques", "Independent assessment", "No video or system was run by this researcher" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2025-12-15", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/how-i-ai/ea-ai-workflows-for-meetings-culture-and-strategy", "evidence_note": "Original How I AI article header displays December 15, 2025 beside reading time. Article date is not independently verified recording or video-upload date; no separate update label found.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-23", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "comm-24", "title": "Zapier's source-grounded strategy companion", "function": "leadership/strategy", "source_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/how-i-ai/ea-ai-workflows-for-meetings-culture-and-strategy", "source_title": "How I AI: Zapier EA Cortney Hickey's 4 AI Workflows for Meeting Prep, Culture Reinforcement, and Strategy", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "leadership/strategy" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2025-12-15", "source_type": "Original interview and published demonstration walkthrough", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Inspect citations and consequential interpretations" ], "unknowns": [ "Retrieval accuracy", "Access design", "Update ownership", "No video or system was run by this researcher" ], "provenance_note": "Summary through context_constraints paraphrase source-backed mechanics. structural_motifs, candidate_midlevel_pattern, transfer_example_explicitly_hypothetical and transfer_limit are analyst interpretations, not tested findings." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2025-12-15", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/how-i-ai/ea-ai-workflows-for-meetings-culture-and-strategy", "evidence_note": "Same original How I AI article as comm-23: header displays December 15, 2025. Article date is not independently verified recording or video-upload date; no separate update label found.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date" }, "eligibility_register_id": "comm-24", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-FIN-01", "title": "GitLab balance-sheet reconciliation", "function": "finance", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/finance/accounting/", "source_title": "Accounting and Reporting — Account Reconciliation Policy", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "finance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P05" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Organizational handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Preparer differs from reviewer" ], "unknowns": [ "Actual compliance and error rates", "Page mixes FloQast and BlackLine references; tool transition unresolved" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-03-18", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/finance/accounting/", "evidence_note": "Page footer explicitly says Last modified March 18, 2026. This is page-level modification, not a verified change date for the reconciliation subsection. No publication date displayed.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_publication_or_update" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-FIN-01", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-FIN-02", "title": "GitLab supplier-invoice intake", "function": "finance", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/finance/accounts-payable/", "source_title": "Accounts Payable", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "finance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04", "P05" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Organizational handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Invoice required; quotation insufficient", "PO balance check" ], "unknowns": [ "Observed cycle time", "Duplicate-detection implementation" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-15", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/finance/accounts-payable/", "evidence_note": "Page footer explicitly says Last modified September 15, 2026. No publication date displayed.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_publication_or_update" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-FIN-02", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-FIN-03", "title": "Houston bank-to-ledger reconciliation", "function": "finance", "source_url": "https://www.uhsystem.edu/resources/compliance-ethics/uhs-policies/sams/03-fiscal-affairs/03g06/index.php", "source_title": "03.G.06 — Bank Account Reconciliation Procedures", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "finance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P05" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2022-01-10", "source_type": "Institutional procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Dated preparer and management certification" ], "unknowns": [ "Matching algorithms", "Materiality thresholds" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2022-01-10", "other_date_type": "policy_last_reviewed_or_revised", "evidence_url": "https://www.uhsystem.edu/resources/compliance-ethics/uhs-policies/sams/03-fiscal-affairs/03g06/index.php", "evidence_note": "Policy footer labels 01/10/2022 Last Reviewed/Revised; also labels 03/08/2002 Issued. US date ordering used. These are policy dates, not verified webpage publication or update dates.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_other_date_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-FIN-03", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-FIN-04", "title": "State Tech journal-entry approval", "function": "finance", "source_url": "https://statetechmo.edu/journal-entry-preparation-and-approval-policy/", "source_title": "Journal Entry Preparation and Approval Policy", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "finance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P05" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2025-10-22", "source_type": "Institutional policy with procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Separate preparer and approver", "Amounts tie to support" ], "unknowns": [ "Rejection/rework procedure", "Posting step", "Audit results" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2025-10-22", "other_date_type": "policy_effective_and_approval", "evidence_url": "https://statetechmo.edu/journal-entry-preparation-and-approval-policy/", "evidence_note": "Policy explicitly labels October 22, 2025 as both effective date and presidential approval date. Webpage publication/update dates not displayed.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_other_date_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-FIN-04", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-FIN-05", "title": "FinOps cost-anomaly investigation", "function": "finance", "source_url": "https://www.finops.org/framework/capabilities/anomaly-management/", "source_title": "Anomaly Management — FinOps Framework", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "finance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P06", "P04" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Practitioner foundation operating guidance", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Inspect subcategories rather than aggregates alone" ], "unknowns": [ "Specific adopting organization", "Alert thresholds", "Measured effectiveness" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.finops.org/framework/capabilities/anomaly-management/", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-FIN-05", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-ENG-01", "title": "PagerDuty NTP incident recovery", "function": "engineering/IT", "source_url": "https://sre.google/workbook/incident-response/", "source_title": "SRE Workbook — Incident Response, PagerDuty case", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "engineering/IT" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P06", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Original practitioner incident account", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Service-owner recovery confirmation" ], "unknowns": [ "Exact configuration change", "Controlled comparison of response effectiveness" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2017-10-06", "other_date_type": "reported_incident_date", "evidence_url": "https://sre.google/workbook/incident-response/", "evidence_note": "Case text dates the PagerDuty incident October 6, 2017. Footer gives book copyright 2018, which is not treated as webpage publication. Chapter publication and update dates not established.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_other_date_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-ENG-01", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-ENG-02", "title": "PagerDuty evidence-linked postmortem", "function": "engineering/IT", "source_url": "https://response.pagerduty.com/after/post_mortem_process/", "source_title": "Postmortem Process", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "engineering/IT" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P06", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Organizational operating handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Evidence for timeline assertions", "Participant review" ], "unknowns": [ "Follow-up ticket completion rate", "Measured recurrence reduction" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://response.pagerduty.com/after/post_mortem_process/", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-ENG-02", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-ENG-03", "title": "Amazon two-phase protocol rollout", "function": "engineering/IT", "source_url": "https://builder.aws.com/content/3F04j2yRAAMBuPSPs50xwXZqg01/ensuring-rollback-safety-during-deployments", "source_title": "Ensuring rollback safety during deployments", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "engineering/IT" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P11", "P09" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2019-12-05", "source_type": "Original engineer walkthrough", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Every-host verification", "Predeployment mixed-version and downgrade tests in a representative test environment" ], "unknowns": [ "Actual rollout metrics", "Universal bake duration" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2019-12-05", "updated": "2019-12-05", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://builder.aws.com/content/3F04j2yRAAMBuPSPs50xwXZqg01/ensuring-rollback-safety-during-deployments", "evidence_note": "Article heading explicitly displays Published Dec 5, 2019 and Last modified Dec 5, 2019.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_publication_or_update" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-ENG-03", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-ENG-04", "title": "Mozilla defect triage", "function": "engineering/IT", "source_url": "https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/bug-mgmt/policies/triage-bugzilla.html", "source_title": "Triage for Bugzilla", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "engineering/IT" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Project operating policy", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Severity-change rationale", "Defects cannot use N/A severity" ], "unknowns": [ "Actual triage adherence", "Classifier accuracy" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/bug-mgmt/policies/triage-bugzilla.html", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-ENG-04", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-ENG-05", "title": "GitLab scoped access request", "function": "engineering/IT", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/eta/corporate-it/end-user-services/access-requests/frequently-asked-questions/", "source_title": "Access Requests (AR) in Compass FAQs", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "engineering/IT" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2026-09-15", "source_type": "Organizational handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Explicit permission scope", "Approval captured in same record" ], "unknowns": [ "Provisioning verification detail", "Actual auto-close behavior" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-15", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/eta/corporate-it/end-user-services/access-requests/frequently-asked-questions/", "evidence_note": "Page footer explicitly says Last modified September 15, 2026. Original publication date not displayed.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_publication_or_update" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-ENG-05", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-LEG-01", "title": "ICO subject-access response preparation", "function": "legal/compliance", "source_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/advice-for-small-organisations/subject-access-requests-sar/how-to-deal-with-a-request-for-information-a-step-by-step-guide/", "source_title": "How to deal with a request for information: a step-by-step guide", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "legal/compliance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P03" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Regulator procedural guidance", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Check redactions cannot reveal hidden text" ], "unknowns": [ "Current applicability of every detail", "Search completeness", "Empirical success rate" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/advice-for-small-organisations/subject-access-requests-sar/how-to-deal-with-a-request-for-information-a-step-by-step-guide/", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-LEG-01", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-LEG-02", "title": "ICO data-protection impact assessment", "function": "legal/compliance", "source_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments-dpias/how-do-we-do-a-dpia/", "source_title": "How do we do a DPIA?", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "legal/compliance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P08" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Regulator procedural guidance", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Documented outcomes and sign-off" ], "unknowns": [ "Actual implementation evidence", "Review cadence", "Risk acceptance in a specific organization" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments-dpias/how-do-we-do-a-dpia/", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-LEG-02", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-LEG-03", "title": "Queen's contract-review intake and completion", "function": "legal/compliance", "source_url": "https://www.queensu.ca/secretariat/legal-counsel/contract-review", "source_title": "Contract Review", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "legal/compliance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Institutional procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Required fields block incomplete submissions" ], "unknowns": [ "Substantive review checklist", "Negotiation steps", "Observed turnaround" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.queensu.ca/secretariat/legal-counsel/contract-review", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-LEG-03", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-LEG-04", "title": "Teachers College conflict-management plan", "function": "legal/compliance", "source_url": "https://www.tc.columbia.edu/vpa/coi/management-procedures/", "source_title": "Management Procedures — Conflict of Interest", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "legal/compliance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04", "P08" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Institutional procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Multiple designated reviews and signatures" ], "unknowns": [ "Enforcement results", "Specific mitigation options", "False-negative rate" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.tc.columbia.edu/vpa/coi/management-procedures/", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-LEG-04", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-LEG-05", "title": "CWU litigation-hold preservation", "function": "legal/compliance", "source_url": "https://www.cwu.edu/about/offices/information-services/policy-management/standards-procedures/litigation-hold-standard.php", "source_title": "InfoSec-Standard-009 — Litigation Hold Standard", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "legal/compliance" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2026-06-15", "source_type": "Institutional standard and procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Evidence checklist", "Follow-up compliance actions" ], "unknowns": [ "Missing words in published text", "Actual preservation verification", "Implementation coverage" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2026-06-15", "other_date_type": "standard_effective_and_review", "evidence_url": "https://www.cwu.edu/about/offices/information-services/policy-management/standards-procedures/litigation-hold-standard.php", "evidence_note": "Standard header says Effective June 15, 2026; history says Review/Effective Date 06/15/26. Scheduled review year 2030 is not a past update. Webpage publication/update dates not established.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_other_date_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-LEG-05", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-PROC-01", "title": "Scottish technical-tender moderation", "function": "procurement/operations", "source_url": "https://procurementjourney.scot/index.php/route-3/evaluation/technical-evaluation", "source_title": "Technical Evaluation — Route 3", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "procurement/operations" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P07" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Government procurement operating guidance", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "No invented bidder details", "Criteria cannot change during evaluation" ], "unknowns": [ "Inter-rater reliability", "Resolution method when consensus fails" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://procurementjourney.scot/index.php/route-3/evaluation/technical-evaluation", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-PROC-01", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-PROC-02", "title": "Federal proposed-price analysis", "function": "procurement/operations", "source_url": "https://www.acquisition.gov/far/15.404-1", "source_title": "FAR 15.404-1 — Proposal analysis techniques", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "procurement/operations" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "qualified", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Government acquisition operating rule", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Historical price must be a valid comparator" ], "unknowns": [ "Actual decision trace", "Practitioner error rates", "Current rule-version date" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2026-03-13", "other_date_type": "displayed_FAC_edition_effective_date", "evidence_url": "https://www.acquisition.gov/far/15.404-1", "evidence_note": "Page header identifies FAC 2026-01, Effective Date 03/13/2026. This is the displayed FAR compilation edition, not proof this section changed on that date, and not webpage publication/update.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_other_date_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-PROC-02", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-PROC-03", "title": "Logistics Cluster blind stock spot-check", "function": "procurement/operations", "source_url": "https://log.logcluster.org/en/monitoring-and-counting", "source_title": "Monitoring and Counting — Logistics Operational Guide", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "procurement/operations" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P05" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Humanitarian operating guide", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Blind count", "Independent second counter" ], "unknowns": [ "Downstream correction approval", "Observed loss reduction" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://log.logcluster.org/en/monitoring-and-counting", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-PROC-03", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-PROC-04", "title": "Tennessee receipt-to-invoice match", "function": "procurement/operations", "source_url": "https://policy.tennessee.edu/procedure/procedure-for-fi0405-procurement-receiving-materials/", "source_title": "Procedure for FI0405: Procurement — Receiving Materials", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "procurement/operations" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P05", "P06" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2024-08-30", "source_type": "Institutional procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Three-way match", "Partial receipts reflect actual quantities" ], "unknowns": [ "How disputes ultimately close", "System enforcement detail" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2024-08-30", "other_date_type": "procedure_effective", "evidence_url": "https://policy.tennessee.edu/procedure/procedure-for-fi0405-procurement-receiving-materials/", "evidence_note": "Procedure footer explicitly says Version 1, Effective 08/30/2024. No separate webpage publication/update date displayed.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "verified_other_date_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-PROC-04", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-PROC-05", "title": "Scottish supplier-performance correction", "function": "procurement/operations", "source_url": "https://www.procurementjourney.scot/route-2/contract-and-supplier-management/contract-and-supplier-management-guidance-non-procurement", "source_title": "Contract and Supplier Management Guidance for Non-Procurement Staff — Route 2", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "procurement/operations" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P06", "P10" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Government procurement operating guidance", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Check what contract permits" ], "unknowns": [ "Outcome metrics", "Evidence needed to verify correction", "Detailed escalation ladder" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.procurementjourney.scot/route-2/contract-and-supplier-management/contract-and-supplier-management-guidance-non-procurement", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-PROC-05", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "OP-PROC-06", "title": "Scottish contract-variation control", "function": "procurement/operations", "source_url": "https://www.procurementjourney.scot/index.php/route-3/contract-and-supplier-management/variations-extensions-amendments", "source_title": "Variations / Extensions / Amendments — Route 3", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "procurement/operations" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P08", "P11" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Government procurement operating guidance", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Approval before supplier negotiations", "Retain signed change evidence" ], "unknowns": [ "Actual organizational implementation", "Time to approval", "Validated effect on scope creep" ], "evidence_notes": "Mechanics paraphrased from the cited source. Motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretation; not claims made by the source." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.procurementjourney.scot/index.php/route-3/contract-and-supplier-management/variations-extensions-amendments", "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z", "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source" }, "eligibility_register_id": "OP-PROC-06", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-01", "title": "Prepare and iterate a discovery conversation", "function": "sales", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/playbook/discovery/", "source_title": "Effective Discovery", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "sales" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P01" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Avoid premature product positioning." ], "unknowns": [ "Actual conversion effects", "Question selection algorithm" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-24", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/playbook/discovery/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-24. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-01", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-02", "title": "Maintain a reviewed opportunity plan", "function": "sales", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/command-of-the-message/command-plan/", "source_title": "Command Plan", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "sales" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Manager review identifies prioritized gaps and owners." ], "unknowns": [ "Review effectiveness", "Actual plan examples" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-24", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/command-of-the-message/command-plan/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-24. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-02", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-03", "title": "Hand off a qualified opportunity", "function": "sales", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/sales-development/", "source_title": "Sales Development", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "sales" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Acceptance and feedback are time-bounded." ], "unknowns": [ "Observed handoff failures", "Exact contents for every handoff type" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-29", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/sales-development/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-29. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-03", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-07", "title": "Triage a support request to the right route", "function": "customer service/success", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/support/workflows/ticket_triage/", "source_title": "Triaging Tickets", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "customer service/success" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Accurate category and environment fields." ], "unknowns": [ "Routing accuracy", "Ambiguous entitlement resolution" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-07-29", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/support/workflows/ticket_triage/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-07-29. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-07", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-08", "title": "Coordinate an account escalation through agreed closure", "function": "customer service/success", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/customer-experience/csm/escalations/", "source_title": "Customer Success Escalations Process", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "customer service/success" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Exit criteria and owners stay current.", "Both parties agree on resolution." ], "unknowns": [ "Real resolution duration", "Effect of cadence" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-24", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/customer-experience/csm/escalations/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-24. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-08", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-09", "title": "Respond to a customer emergency", "function": "customer service/success", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/support/workflows/customer_emergencies_workflows/", "source_title": "How to Perform Customer Emergencies Duties", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "customer service/success" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P06", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Contact customer before resolving the alert." ], "unknowns": [ "Outcome rates", "Detailed technical diagnosis for individual incidents" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-24", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/support/workflows/customer_emergencies_workflows/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-24. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-09", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-10", "title": "Turn customer feedback into prioritized improvements", "function": "customer service/success", "source_url": "https://www.helpscout.com/blog/customer-feedback/", "source_title": "How To Collect and Act on Customer Service Feedback", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "customer service/success" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P07", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2025-10-20", "source_type": "First-party practitioner account", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Interpret scores alongside comments and case context." ], "unknowns": [ "Full prioritization rubric", "Implementation lead time" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2025-10-20", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.helpscout.com/blog/customer-feedback/", "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2025-10-20; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_published_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-10", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-12", "title": "Investigate a service complaint and communicate findings", "function": "customer service/success", "source_url": "https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/sites/default/files/MCHP_NHS_CS_Dec_2022.pdf", "source_title": "Model complaint handling procedure: NHS Complaint Standards", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "customer service/success" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P06", "P03" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Public ombudsman model procedure", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Consider comments before final response.", "Responsible person or delegate signs." ], "unknowns": [ "Local adoption", "Actual case outcomes", "Current superseding procedure", "Publication date independently verified from document text or official listing" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer.", "source_date_provenance": "Month and year encoded in the PDF filename MCHP_NHS_CS_Dec_2022.pdf; no publication date verified in extracted document text." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2022-12", "other_date_type": "filename_indicated_month", "evidence_url": "https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/sites/default/files/MCHP_NHS_CS_Dec_2022.pdf", "evidence_note": "Original PDF reopened; filename MCHP_NHS_CS_Dec_2022.pdf indicates December 2022. No publication or revision date verified in extracted PDF text; text search for 2022 returns no match. The filename hint is not a verified publication date.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "filename_hint_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-12", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-13", "title": "Define a role before assessing applicants", "function": "people/HR", "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/hiring-process/", "source_title": "How We Hire: A Look Inside Our Hiring Process", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "people/HR" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P03", "P10" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "qualified", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2018-03-14", "source_type": "First-party practitioner account", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Common criteria support consistent evaluation." ], "unknowns": [ "Current process", "Actual bias reduction" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2018-03-14", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/hiring-process/", "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2018-03-14; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_published_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-13", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-14", "title": "Prepare a candidate-facing question guide", "function": "people/HR", "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/buffer-q-a-doc/", "source_title": "We Send A Q&A Doc To Candidates Before We Meet Them: Here’s Why and How", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "people/HR" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2026-07-28", "source_type": "First-party practitioner account", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [], "unknowns": [ "Maintenance cadence", "Factual review", "Measured interview impact" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2026-07-28", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/buffer-q-a-doc/", "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2026-07-28; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_published_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-14", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-15", "title": "Reconcile independent performance reviews", "function": "people/HR", "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/performance-reviews-mixed-feelings/", "source_title": "How We Run Performance Reviews At Buffer And Why I Have Mixed Feelings About Them", "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "functions": [ "people/HR" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P07" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "qualified", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2023-08-10", "source_type": "First-party practitioner account", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "The author describes independent manager drafting as intended to avoid influence from the self-review; no measured effect is established.", "The author describes cross-manager calibration as aiming for consistency; no measured fairness or consistency gain is established." ], "unknowns": [ "Measured fairness", "Current process", "All calibration details" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer.", "quality_checks_claim_type": "Practitioner-reported process and intended benefits; not measured effectiveness" }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2023-08-10", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/performance-reviews-mixed-feelings/", "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2023-08-10; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_published_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-15", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-16", "title": "Track onboarding obligations to closure", "function": "people/HR", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/general-onboarding/", "source_title": "GitLab Onboarding", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "people/HR" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P10" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2026-09-13", "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Monthly audit checks tasks and compliance obligations." ], "unknowns": [ "Audit exception outcomes", "Completion quality" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-13", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/general-onboarding/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-13. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-16", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-17", "title": "Coordinate a voluntary departure and access closure", "function": "people/HR", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/offboarding/", "source_title": "GitLab Offboarding", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "people/HR" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P10", "P11" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Weekly audit; checklist records revocation or non-applicability." ], "unknowns": [ "Current jurisdictional requirements", "Actual audit compliance" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-09-13", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/offboarding/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-13. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-17", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-18", "title": "Evaluate a realistic work sample with feedback", "function": "people/HR", "source_url": "https://automattic.com/work-with-us/", "source_title": "Work With Us", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "people/HR" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P09", "P07" ], "split": "held-out", "fit": "direct", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party hiring process documentation", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Evaluation emphasizes working approach rather than platform trivia." ], "unknowns": [ "Scoring rubric", "Inter-rater reliability", "Compensation terms for each test" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://automattic.com/work-with-us/", "evidence_note": "Original source page retrieved and inspected for article-level publication/update dates. No publication or last-updated date established from rendered text. Copyright years, linked article dates, relative search dates and crawl dates are excluded.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "not_found" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-18", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-19", "title": "Turn a retrospective into assigned improvements", "function": "administration/project coordination", "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/agile-tools-techniques", "source_title": "Agile tools and techniques", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "administration/project coordination" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P01", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2026-03-31", "source_type": "Government service manual", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Open atmosphere lets all participants contribute." ], "unknowns": [ "Action completion rate", "Specific facilitation conflicts" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2016-02-16", "updated": "2026-03-31", "other_date": "2016-01-05", "other_date_type": "conflicting_first_publication_history_entry", "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/agile-tools-techniques", "evidence_note": "Original GOV.UK Updates to this page labels Published: 16 February 2016 and Last updated: 31 March 2026. The same history lists 5 January 2016 as Guidance first published. Both indicators are preserved; original publication conflict remains unresolved.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_dates_with_publication_conflict" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-19", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-20", "title": "Maintain an evidence-informed roadmap", "function": "administration/project coordination", "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/developing-a-roadmap", "source_title": "Developing a roadmap", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "administration/project coordination" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P07", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "Government service manual", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Keep alternate versions synchronized.", "Use clear language." ], "unknowns": [ "Specific prioritization method", "Outcome results" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": "2017-11-16", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/developing-a-roadmap", "evidence_note": "Original GOV.UK page explicitly labels Published: 16 November 2017. No last-updated field appears in retrieved text.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_published_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-20", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-22", "title": "Map dependencies and assign review loops", "function": "administration/project coordination", "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/dependency-mapping", "source_title": "Dependency Mapping", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "administration/project coordination" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P08", "P10" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public team playbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Stakeholders can correct omissions.", "Every risk has an owner." ], "unknowns": [ "Observed dependency failures", "Acceptance protocol" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/dependency-mapping", "evidence_note": "Original source page retrieved and inspected for article-level publication/update dates. No publication or last-updated date established from rendered text. Copyright years, linked article dates, relative search dates and crawl dates are excluded.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "not_found" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-22", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-23", "title": "Review a purchase request through an approval queue", "function": "administration/project coordination", "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/business-technology/enterprise-applications/guides/zip-guide/", "source_title": "Zip End Users Guide", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "administration/project coordination" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P04" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": "2026-05-27", "source_type": "First-party public handbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Complete node-specific checks before approval." ], "unknowns": [ "Full approval matrix", "Actual compliance" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": "2026-05-27", "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/business-technology/enterprise-applications/guides/zip-guide/", "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-05-27. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "verified_updated_only" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-23", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "svc-24", "title": "Audit recent decisions to reduce avoidable delay", "function": "administration/project coordination", "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/decision-making-retro", "source_title": "Decision-Making Retro", "evidence_status": "documented-procedure", "functions": [ "administration/project coordination" ], "aliases": [], "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P06" ], "split": "training", "fit": "mapped", "coding_basis": "Exploratory analyst coding of collected source summaries; not independently tested", "source_date_if_verified": null, "source_type": "First-party public team playbook", "source_caveats": { "quality_checks": [ "Review AI output against remembered friction." ], "unknowns": [ "Model and retrieval setup", "Independent effect of AI", "Actual adoption" ], "interpretation_boundary": "Summary, steps, inputs, outputs, decision points, quality checks, exceptions and context constraints summarize the cited source. Structural motifs, candidate pattern and transfer fields are analyst interpretations, not demonstrated transfer." }, "source_refreshed_after_final_audit": "2026-10-18", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/decision-making-retro", "evidence_note": "Original source page retrieved and inspected for article-level publication/update dates. No publication or last-updated date established from rendered text. Copyright years, linked article dates, relative search dates and crawl dates are excluded.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z", "status": "not_found" }, "eligibility_register_id": "svc-24", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness." }, { "id": "XOPS-01", "title": "Toyota turns mail-arrival polling into shared ownership", "function": "operations/coordination", "source_url": "https://toyotatimes.jp/en/series/Imaginative_and_creative/003.html", "source_title": "Transforming Administrative Tasks--Digital Notifications for Internal Mail", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2025-03-04", "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified", "evidence_url": "https://toyotatimes.jp/en/series/Imaginative_and_creative/003.html", "evidence_note": "Page displays 2025-03-04 without separately labeling publication versus update.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P10" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XOPS-01", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://toyotatimes.jp/en/series/Imaginative_and_creative/003.html", "fit": "partial", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P10" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [], "rationale": "Ownership notification and pickup/reset support coordination, but event replacement and redistribution of invisible labor exceed commitment tracking. A button claim is not independently verified completion.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "event_visibility", "labor_ownership", "physical_execution" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "documented workflow", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source account gives a coherent workflow with explicit stages, dependencies or checkpoints; documented means documented in the source, not independently observed or validated.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XOPS-01", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "operations/coordination" ] }, { "id": "XOPS-04", "title": "DHL turns booking correspondence into shipment records", "function": "operations/booking administration", "source_url": "https://group.dhl.com/content/dam/deutschepostdhl/de/media-center/investors/documents/capital-markets-days/DHL-Group-DGFF-Capital-Market-Briefing-London-March-2026.pdf", "source_title": "Capital Market Briefing: Update Oscar de Bok, slide 13", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2026-03-31", "other_date_type": "presentation_event_date", "evidence_url": "https://group.dhl.com/content/dam/deutschepostdhl/de/media-center/investors/documents/capital-markets-days/DHL-Group-DGFF-Capital-Market-Briefing-London-March-2026.pdf", "evidence_note": "Cover and slide 13 identify Capital Market Briefing, London, 31 March 2026. This is the presentation date; upload/publication date not established.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z", "status": "verified_event_date_only" }, "evidence_status": "organization-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "fit", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XOPS-04", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://group.dhl.com/content/dam/deutschepostdhl/de/media-center/investors/documents/capital-markets-days/DHL-Group-DGFF-Capital-Market-Briefing-London-March-2026.pdf", "fit": "fit", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [ "P05" ], "rationale": "Extracting booking fields into shipment records is artifact transformation. Human validation alone does not prove independent-reference reconciliation.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "data_preparation", "authority_boundary" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "documented workflow", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source account gives a coherent workflow with explicit stages, dependencies or checkpoints; documented means documented in the source, not independently observed or validated.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XOPS-04", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "operations/booking administration" ] }, { "id": "XOPS-07", "title": "Hilton Tokyo Bay uses waste evidence to revise preparation and purchasing", "function": "operations/food planning", "source_url": "https://stories.hilton.com/apac/releases/savoring-sustainability-hotels-in-asia-pacific-tackling-food-waste", "source_title": "Hotels in Asia Pacific Tackling Food Waste", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2024-08-15", "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified", "evidence_url": "https://stories.hilton.com/apac/releases/savoring-sustainability-hotels-in-asia-pacific-tackling-food-waste", "evidence_note": "News Releases header displays August 15, 2024; no separate update history established.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified" }, "evidence_status": "organization-reported", "pattern_ids": [], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P07" ], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XOPS-07", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://stories.hilton.com/apac/releases/savoring-sustainability-hotels-in-asia-pacific-tackling-food-waste", "fit": "partial", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P07" ], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [ "P09" ], "rationale": "Waste evidence informs changes, but the account lacks a deliberate test and evaluated alternatives; passive measurement is not an experiment.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "ongoing_adaptation", "physical_execution" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "reported practice with sufficient mechanics", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source supplies a bounded task, material inputs and outputs, and concrete transformations or feedback; all practice remains source-reported, not independently observed.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XOPS-07", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "operations/food planning" ] }, { "id": "XOPS-09", "title": "Singapore General Hospital reconciles daily service charges with exceptions", "function": "finance/billing operations", "source_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/singapore-health/enhancing-patient-care-operations", "source_title": "Enhancing patient care operations", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2024-01-10", "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified", "evidence_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/singapore-health/enhancing-patient-care-operations", "evidence_note": "Page displays 2024-01-10 without separately labeling publication versus update.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P05" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P06" ], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "fit", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XOPS-09", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/singapore-health/enhancing-patient-care-operations", "fit": "fit", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P05" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P06" ], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [], "rationale": "Daily test records are compared with billing and discrepancies handled. Exception checking is supported but detailed causal diagnosis is not.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "authority_boundary" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "documented workflow", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source account gives a coherent workflow with explicit stages, dependencies or checkpoints; documented means documented in the source, not independently observed or validated.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XOPS-09", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "finance/billing operations" ] }, { "id": "XOPS-10", "title": "Singapore General Hospital turns fragmented bill enquiries into one service", "function": "customer service/billing enquiries", "source_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/Lighternotes/digital-first-counter-less-strategy-takes-shape-in-sgh", "source_title": "Digital-first, counter-less strategy takes shape in SGH", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2021-05-31", "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified", "evidence_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/Lighternotes/digital-first-counter-less-strategy-takes-shape-in-sgh", "evidence_note": "Page displays 2021-05-31 without separately labeling publication versus update.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z", "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P11" ], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XOPS-10", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/Lighternotes/digital-first-counter-less-strategy-takes-shape-in-sgh", "fit": "partial", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P11" ], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "rationale": "Service consolidation and training describe transition, but continuity/verification details are sparse. A supplied email template does not establish an artifact-drafting workflow.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "labor_ownership", "relationship_outcomes" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "reported practice with sufficient mechanics", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source supplies a bounded task, material inputs and outputs, and concrete transformations or feedback; all practice remains source-reported, not independently observed.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XOPS-10", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "customer service/billing enquiries" ] }, { "id": "XOPS-12", "title": "Mayo Clinic converts referral documents into a reviewed cover sheet", "function": "operations/referral intake", "source_url": "https://mayomagazine.mayoclinic.org/2026/06/accelerating-hope/", "source_title": "How Intelligent Automation Is Transforming Patient Referrals", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "2024-07", "other_date_type": "reported_system_launch_month", "evidence_url": "https://mayomagazine.mayoclinic.org/2026/06/accelerating-hope/", "evidence_note": "Body explicitly states July 2024 launch. URL includes 2026/06 but no displayed publication date was established; URL date is not promoted to publication metadata.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z", "status": "verified_event_date_only" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "fit", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XOPS-12", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://mayomagazine.mayoclinic.org/2026/06/accelerating-hope/", "fit": "fit", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [], "rationale": "Document extraction, summarized cover sheet and staff accuracy review fit evidence synthesis and drafting within the expressly administrative boundary.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "authority_boundary" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "documented workflow", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source account gives a coherent workflow with explicit stages, dependencies or checkpoints; documented means documented in the source, not independently observed or validated.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XOPS-12", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "operations/referral intake" ] }, { "id": "XCRE-01", "title": "Barefoot turns shared practice into co-authored guidance", "function": "Community learning and collaborative authorship", "source_url": "https://www.barefootguide.org/our-story", "source_title": "Ten years of Barefoot Guides for Social Change: Unlocking collective generosity and intelligence", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "6/5/2017", "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note", "evidence_url": "https://www.barefootguide.org/our-story", "evidence_note": "Page displays 6/5/2017, ambiguous day/month order. Narrative names 2006 workshops and 2007 publication; neither is the page publication date.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984838+00:00", "status": "ambiguous_displayed_date" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P01" ], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XCRE-01", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://www.barefootguide.org/our-story", "fit": "partial", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P01" ], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [], "rationale": "A co-authored guide is an artifact; the process also creates shared voice and a community of practice, which are substantive outcomes rather than delivery controls.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "relationship_outcomes", "co_creation" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "documented workflow", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source account gives a coherent workflow with explicit stages, dependencies or checkpoints; documented means documented in the source, not independently observed or validated.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XCRE-01", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "Community learning and collaborative authorship" ] }, { "id": "XCRE-04", "title": "UCA develops a shared digital strategy through flexible workshops", "function": "Institutional planning and consultation", "source_url": "https://www.jisc.ac.uk/case-studies/using-consultancy-to-enable-digital-transformation", "source_title": "Using consultancy to enable digital transformation", "source_dates": { "published": "2025-01-14", "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://www.jisc.ac.uk/case-studies/using-consultancy-to-enable-digital-transformation", "evidence_note": "Article displays 2025-01-14. No updated date observed.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984873+00:00", "status": "verified_displayed_date" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P01", "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P10" ], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XCRE-04", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://www.jisc.ac.uk/case-studies/using-consultancy-to-enable-digital-transformation", "fit": "partial", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P01", "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P10" ], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [ "P11" ], "rationale": "Inquiry and strategy artifacts are described with weekly coordination. A strategy is not evidence of implemented controlled change; shared ownership and dissent remain distinct.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "co_creation", "relationship_outcomes" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "documented workflow", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source account gives a coherent workflow with explicit stages, dependencies or checkpoints; documented means documented in the source, not independently observed or validated.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XCRE-04", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "Institutional planning and consultation" ] }, { "id": "XCRE-05", "title": "Oxford interprets anonymized staff survey feedback with AI", "function": "Community insight and internal communication", "source_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/survey-analysis-and-insight-with-copilot-and-gemini", "source_title": "Survey analysis and insight with Copilot and Gemini", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/survey-analysis-and-insight-with-copilot-and-gemini", "evidence_note": "No publication or update date observed in accessible article text.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984877+00:00", "status": "unknown_publication_date" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P03", "P05" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "fit", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XCRE-05", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/survey-analysis-and-insight-with-copilot-and-gemini", "fit": "fit", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P02", "P03", "P05" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [], "rationale": "Survey synthesis, audience-aware output and checks against the original data are reported. FAQ generation is still exploratory and should not be merged into the executed account.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "minority_voice" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "documented workflow", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source account gives a coherent workflow with explicit stages, dependencies or checkpoints; documented means documented in the source, not independently observed or validated.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XCRE-05", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "Community insight and internal communication" ] }, { "id": "XCRE-06", "title": "Oxford grants staff co-design internal tools with ChatGPT", "function": "Process improvement and internal tool design", "source_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/generative-ai-as-a-design-partner-for-process-improvement", "source_title": "Generative AI as a design partner for process improvement", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": null, "other_date_type": null, "evidence_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/generative-ai-as-a-design-partner-for-process-improvement", "evidence_note": "No publication or update date observed in accessible article text.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984882+00:00", "status": "unknown_publication_date" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P01", "P09" ], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XCRE-06", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/generative-ai-as-a-design-partner-for-process-improvement", "fit": "partial", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P01", "P09" ], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [ "P11" ], "rationale": "Prototype/refinement work supports artifact creation; stress-testing lacks enough described observations and learning criteria for a full P09 assignment. No production readiness is established.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "co_creation" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "reported practice with sufficient mechanics", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source supplies a bounded task, material inputs and outputs, and concrete transformations or feedback; all practice remains source-reported, not independently observed.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XCRE-06", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "Process improvement and internal tool design" ] }, { "id": "XCRE-08", "title": "La Cadera de Eva connects editorial signals with audience judgment", "function": "Editorial planning", "source_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/from-intuition-to-intelligence-building-a-data-driven-newsroom-tool", "source_title": "From intuition to intelligence: Building a data-driven newsroom tool", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "17 Mar", "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note", "evidence_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/from-intuition-to-intelligence-building-a-data-driven-newsroom-tool", "evidence_note": "Article displays 17 Mar without a year. Search relative publication metadata is not used to invent a full date.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984891+00:00", "status": "partial_displayed_date" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P07" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P02" ], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XCRE-08", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/from-intuition-to-intelligence-building-a-data-driven-newsroom-tool", "fit": "partial", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P07" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P02" ], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [], "rationale": "Editorial relevance recommendations support option selection; traceability and criteria remain limited. Audience popularity does not decide public-interest value.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "creative_quality", "minority_voice" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "reported practice with sufficient mechanics", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source supplies a bounded task, material inputs and outputs, and concrete transformations or feedback; all practice remains source-reported, not independently observed.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XCRE-08", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "Editorial planning" ] }, { "id": "XCRE-09", "title": "A journalist develops a narrative-game storytelling prototype", "function": "Creative journalism and format experimentation", "source_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/gaming-the-censors-a-new-way-to-tell-chinas-untold-stories", "source_title": "Gaming the censors: A new way to tell China’s untold stories", "source_dates": { "published": null, "updated": null, "other_date": "31 Mar", "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note", "evidence_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/gaming-the-censors-a-new-way-to-tell-chinas-untold-stories", "evidence_note": "Article displays 31 Mar without a year. No full publication date inferred.", "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984895+00:00", "status": "partial_displayed_date" }, "evidence_status": "practitioner-reported", "pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P09" ], "split": "expansion_not_validation", "fit": "partial", "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "expansion_classification": { "id": "XCRE-09", "record_kind": "new_case", "source_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/gaming-the-censors-a-new-way-to-tell-chinas-untold-stories", "fit": "partial", "matched_existing_pattern_ids": [ "P03" ], "partial_candidate_pattern_ids": [ "P09" ], "not_supported_pattern_ids": [], "rationale": "Creating and showing a narrative prototype supports constrained artifact production. Mentor reaction is not a documented audience evaluation or safe-distribution test.", "newly_needed_dimensions": [ "creative_quality", "co_creation" ], "coding_basis": "Post-codebook exploratory independent review; not held-out validation or observed execution", "source_claims_basis": "See expansion-audit.json; practitioner/vendor/creator report or static artifact, never independently observed practice", "inclusion_disposition": "reported practice with sufficient mechanics", "canonical_workflow_or_practice_eligible": true, "inclusion_reason": "Source supplies a bounded task, material inputs and outputs, and concrete transformations or feedback; all practice remains source-reported, not independently observed.", "classification_use": "Exploratory family mapping of a qualified source-reported example; not effectiveness evidence." }, "eligibility_register_id": "XCRE-09", "mapping_scope": "Eligible workflow/practice reference; exploratory family mapping, not evidence of effectiveness.", "functions": [ "Creative journalism and format experimentation" ] } ]