{
  "status": "Frozen after 54 training records and before viewing 18 held-out records; exploratory analyst codebook, 2026-10-18",
  "patterns": [
    {"id":"P01","name":"Investigate needs through inquiry","contract":"Uncertain needs or situation → questions, responses, and a progressively clarified account","inclusion":"Purposeful elicitation from people or stakeholders, with unresolved questions guiding further inquiry","exclusion":"Merely retrieving existing documents or running a diagnostic repair"},
    {"id":"P02","name":"Assemble grounded evidence","contract":"Distributed source material → traceable retrieval, synthesis, or a decision-ready evidence packet","inclusion":"Organize existing evidence and preserve its relation to claims or questions","exclusion":"Generating unsupported content or making the authoritative decision itself"},
    {"id":"P03","name":"Draft and adapt a constrained artifact","contract":"A brief, source, or existing artifact → a usable draft or adaptation meeting explicit audience, format, or content constraints","inclusion":"Produce or transform a deliverable; quality checks may be automated or human","exclusion":"Treating the resulting artifact as approved simply because it was generated"},
    {"id":"P04","name":"Triage and route incoming work","contract":"Incoming item → clarified category, priority, eligibility, or accountable destination","inclusion":"Determine handling path and resolve missing intake context","exclusion":"Downstream investigation or final substantive approval"},
    {"id":"P05","name":"Reconcile claims and records","contract":"Claim or record plus reference evidence → checked agreement, discrepancies, and a substantiated correction or certification","inclusion":"Check factual or accounting correspondence against independent reference material","exclusion":"Generic stylistic review, forecasting, or diagnosis without a reference comparison"},
    {"id":"P06","name":"Diagnose and resolve an exception","contract":"Unexpected failure, anomaly, or complaint → investigated explanation and a bounded remedy or recovery path","inclusion":"Inspect evidence, distinguish causes or explanations, then prepare or attempt resolution","exclusion":"Routine intake routing or speculative future risk"},
    {"id":"P07","name":"Compare options for a decision","contract":"Options and contextual criteria → reasoned ranking, recommendation, or recorded authorized choice","inclusion":"Make criteria, tradeoffs, evidence, and decision authority explicit as available","exclusion":"Ranking without purpose or treating advice as authority"},
    {"id":"P08","name":"Anticipate risks and plan mitigations","contract":"Proposed activity, dependencies, or disclosed risk → identified hazards and specific mitigation plans","inclusion":"Prospective risk analysis, mitigation assignment, and review","exclusion":"A current incident investigation alone or a generic approval gate"},
    {"id":"P09","name":"Test alternatives and learn","contract":"Hypotheses or alternatives → deliberate test, observed results, and updated selection or next action","inclusion":"Explicitly gather new evidence through a test or structured learning cycle","exclusion":"Ungrounded critique, passive monitoring, or a theory diagram without a test"},
    {"id":"P10","name":"Coordinate commitments to closure","contract":"An objective involving people or teams → accountable next actions, handoffs, tracking, and agreed closure","inclusion":"Maintain ownership, timing, unresolved work, and completion conditions","exclusion":"A one-time routing decision without subsequent coordination"},
    {"id":"P11","name":"Roll out a controlled change","contract":"Existing operational state → coordinated transition that manages affected parties, dependencies, and verification","inclusion":"Migration, retirement, or distributed changes with explicit continuity or consistency concerns","exclusion":"Any ordinary edit, or indefinitely preserving a restricted state without a change rollout"}
  ],
  "cross_cutting_facets": ["Independent reviewer and authority boundary", "Evidence provenance and freshness", "Data sensitivity", "Stakes and failure consequences", "Reversibility and rollback", "Approval invalidation after change", "Human/AI allocation", "Documented control-flow motifs"],
  "known_training_residuals": [
    {"case_id":"comm-21","reason":"Constructing a theory of change is causal/hypothesis modeling; explicit testing is not documented, so P09 would overclaim. Needs a causal-model facet or a future pattern if additional cases support it."},
    {"case_id":"OP-LEG-05","reason":"Litigation holds partly use coordination, but the substantive preservation-and-scoped-release lifecycle is not captured by coordination or controlled rollout."},
    {"case_id":"comm-03","reason":"Independent publication authorization is primarily a cross-cutting approval gate, not equivalent to artifact drafting or factual reconciliation."}
  ]
}