{
  "audit_version": "1.1",
  "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
  "scope": "All 71 baseline workflow cases, 12 social cases, 24 expansion cases, six enrichment records and existing alias svc-21. Originals unchanged.",
  "policy": "Tool/service seller customer stories and own-product success showcases require separately established substantive practitioner evidence. Ordinary operating documentation and firsthand practice can be process references, never automatic effectiveness proof.",
  "counts": {
    "canonical_cases": 107,
    "all_ids_including_aliases": 108,
    "eligible_canonical": 84,
    "excluded_canonical": 23,
    "by_source_category": {
      "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice": 30,
      "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure": 53,
      "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story": 20,
      "sponsored_or_uncertain_lead": 4
    }
  },
  "search_limitations": [
    "Targeted public searches, not exhaustive negative proof. No result means corroboration not established, never that it does not exist.",
    "Search-index dates and snippets were not silently promoted into verified publication dates.",
    "Baseline provenance audit used full saved records and enrichment evidence. Selected boundary cases and candidate corroboration were reread live; this was not a fresh full-page reread of all 107 original sources."
  ],
  "input_sha256": {
    "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json": "0bc154bc47a14a186d10ce67265f62f9245a5a575dcf53459af3db452eb438af",
    "social-builds.json": "aa043ff74cc981ed31c418d1f04e27908e93e7b6803b38312d091aded4802552",
    "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json": "b0c9c979be37b2f19c4d18429c5bb66af69e46d748aeb88bf9edc660c55cfaa9",
    "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json": "6068286f33e07084b8c40ba2bc3f30d90e326573d2fd3401c9a3ffb23f5429b6",
    "expansion/social-deepening.json": "e7d2210fc04945502e22474e7e6f6d7d1e4a611135e5f0644aa28778b6961092"
  },
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "comm-01",
      "canonical_id": "comm-01",
      "title": "Buffer's search-led tutorial production",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Writer explains the organization’s editorial work; reference supports described steps, not a Buffer-product effectiveness claim.",
      "source_relationship": "First-person practitioner walkthrough",
      "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/how-to-write-a-blog-post/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Measured causal effect of individual steps",
        "Editorial rejection rates",
        "Search-demand evidence does not establish instructional effectiveness."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2024-09-05",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/how-to-write-a-blog-post/",
        "evidence_note": "Article header near title displays Sep 5, 2024. Treated as displayed publication date; no separate update label or original publication history established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-02",
      "canonical_id": "comm-02",
      "title": "Ahrefs page-by-page content audit",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Method author provides a content-audit procedure with worked examples; tool-marketing context is disclosed but no customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Practitioner method with worked examples",
      "source_url": "https://ahrefs.com/blog/content-audit/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "General effect sizes",
        "Exact thresholds for each business",
        "Traffic cannot substitute for mandatory access, compliance, or user usefulness."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2023-09-15",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://ahrefs.com/blog/content-audit/",
        "evidence_note": "Article byline displays September 15, 2023, without specifying whether this is original publication or revision. Preserved as an untyped article date rather than guessing.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-03",
      "canonical_id": "comm-03",
      "title": "GOV.UK independent publishing review",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Official publishing handbook",
      "source_url": "https://guidance.publishing.service.gov.uk/publish-update-retire-content/standard-content-types/send-standard-review/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Reviewer turnaround time",
        "Review rubric is on a separate page",
        "Reviewer independence and notification behavior must be implemented in the destination system."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://guidance.publishing.service.gov.uk/publish-update-retire-content/standard-content-types/send-standard-review/",
        "evidence_note": "Original publishing-handbook page was reopened; no publication or last-update label appears in retrieved text. Do not borrow dates from the retired GOV.UK URL or crawl time.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-04",
      "canonical_id": "comm-04",
      "title": "Mailchimp single-variable email experiment",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Product help documentation establishes how to configure an A/B test; it does not establish that A/B testing improves outcomes in a given context.",
      "source_relationship": "Official product procedure",
      "source_url": "https://mailchimp.com/help/create-ab-tests/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Sample-specific statistical power",
        "Independent evaluation of defaults",
        "Tool-selected winners are not necessarily statistically reliable or causally generalizable."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://mailchimp.com/help/create-ab-tests/",
        "evidence_note": "Original Mailchimp help article was reopened and searched for update labels. No page publication/update date established; dates of linked resources or product changes are not page dates.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-05",
      "canonical_id": "comm-05",
      "title": "Anthropic's AI-assisted responsive ad copy",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Anthropic employee showcasing the seller’s own Claude product; no independent practitioner corroboration of this ad-copy workflow established.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party employee workflow interview",
      "source_url": "https://claude.com/resources/articles/how-anthropic-uses-claude-marketing",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [
        {
          "url": "https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20260225-how-anthropic-uses-claude-marketing",
          "relationship": "Secondary coverage of the Anthropic employee story.",
          "assessment": "Reject: derivative coverage, not separate practitioner use.",
          "source_date": "2026-02-25",
          "source_date_type": "date_in_article_url",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": false,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": null,
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": "2026-02-25",
            "other_date_type": "date_in_article_url",
            "evidence_url": "https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20260225-how-anthropic-uses-claude-marketing",
            "evidence_note": "Date encoded in article URL; not independently verified as publication or update.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        }
      ],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Full prompts and skills",
        "Failure frequency",
        "Campaign lift attributable to workflow",
        "Strong examples and genuine audience knowledge remain necessary; reported speed is not independently verified.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2026-01-26",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://claude.com/resources/articles/how-anthropic-uses-claude-marketing",
        "evidence_note": "Original page labels the value only Date: January 26, 2026. Publication versus update is not explicitly distinguished; retained as displayed article date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-06",
      "canonical_id": "comm-06",
      "title": "Buffer's AI-assisted glossary construction",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Staff describe glossary outline generation and substantial human enrichment. The glossary tool is not identified as Buffer’s AI; retain only the reported process, not product or time-saving claims.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party team practice report",
      "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/how-we-use-ai-in-content/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Exact production prompt",
        "Entry-level review evidence",
        "Whether practice changed later",
        "Uniform structure does not establish truth; specialized terminology needs authoritative review."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2024-03-14",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/how-we-use-ai-in-content/",
        "evidence_note": "Article header near title displays Mar 14, 2024. Treated as displayed publication date; no separate update label or original publication history established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-07",
      "canonical_id": "comm-07",
      "title": "Basecamp's shaped project pitch",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Operating handbook provides project-pitch practice and examples; not a customer-success story.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party operating handbook with actual pitch examples",
      "source_url": "https://basecamp.com/shapeup/1.5-chapter-06",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Pitch rejection rates",
        "Independent outcome measurement",
        "Roughness is useful only if critical feasibility risks have already been considered."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://basecamp.com/shapeup/1.5-chapter-06",
        "evidence_note": "Original Shape Up chapter was reopened. No chapter publication/update label established. Book publication year cannot be assigned to this living chapter without specific evidence.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-08",
      "canonical_id": "comm-08",
      "title": "Intercom's RICE prioritization review",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Original practitioner method",
      "source_url": "https://www.intercom.com/blog/rice-simple-prioritization-for-product-managers",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Calibration accuracy",
        "Measured superiority over alternatives",
        "Different objectives or incomparable impacts can make a single ranking misleading."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2018-01-05",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.intercom.com/blog/rice-simple-prioritization-for-product-managers",
        "evidence_note": "Author byline displays Sean McBride, 5 January 2018. Recorded as displayed publication date; no separate update date found.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-09",
      "canonical_id": "comm-09",
      "title": "GitLab's shared-responsibility issue routing",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Public operating handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development/how-we-work/issue-triage/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Resolution-rate improvement",
        "Time spent in disputed ownership",
        "Ownership labels alone cannot resolve contested budgets or responsibility."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-07-31",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/product-development/how-we-work/issue-triage/",
        "evidence_note": "Page footer explicitly says Last modified July 31, 2026 and links commit 5d615813. Original publication not established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_update_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-10",
      "canonical_id": "comm-10",
      "title": "GOV.UK service-retirement transition",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Official service handbook",
      "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/retiring-your-service",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Actual retirement outcomes",
        "Successor readiness assessment details",
        "Legal data duties and mandated-service obligations vary; this is not legal advice."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2016-08-04",
        "updated": "2025-08-26",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/retiring-your-service",
        "evidence_note": "Updates to this page explicitly labels Published 4 August 2016 and Last updated 26 August 2025; history confirms first publication.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_explicit_publication_and_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-11",
      "canonical_id": "comm-11",
      "title": "Autodesk's template-grounded AI product draft",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "ChatPRD-published Autodesk customer success story; named customer quotation is inside the vendor story, not an independent source.",
      "source_relationship": "Vendor-published customer interview",
      "source_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/customers/autodesk",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Full prompts",
        "Rejected drafts",
        "Measured accuracy",
        "Independent verification of efficiency claims",
        "Measured template fidelity and any formal template-acceptance gate",
        "Template compliance does not prove factual completeness or stakeholder agreement.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/customers/autodesk",
        "evidence_note": "Original Autodesk customer-story page reopened. No publication/update label appears in retrieved text; vendor success claims do not establish a date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-12",
      "canonical_id": "comm-12",
      "title": "Product Talk opportunity-to-assumption discovery",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Original method author guidance",
      "source_url": "https://www.producttalk.org/2016/08/opportunity-solution-tree/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Observed outcomes in a specific implementation",
        "Test-selection details",
        "Qualitative discovery does not by itself estimate population prevalence or prove business impact."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2023-12-06",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.producttalk.org/opportunity-solution-trees/",
        "evidence_note": "Requested /2016/08/opportunity-solution-tree/ URL redirects to /opportunity-solution-trees/. Current article header shows 06 Dec 2023; it does not label this as original publication or revision. URL-embedded 2016 is not used as date evidence.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-13",
      "canonical_id": "comm-13",
      "title": "GDS collaborative research analysis",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Official research handbook",
      "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/analyse-a-research-session",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Inter-rater agreement",
        "Treatment of contradictory observations",
        "Downstream implementation rate",
        "Discarding isolated observations can hide rare but important failures; the transfer needs explicit minority-evidence handling."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2016-05-24",
        "updated": "2016-05-24",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/analyse-a-research-session",
        "evidence_note": "Updates to this page explicitly labels both publication and last update 24 May 2016; first-publication history matches.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_explicit_publication_and_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-14",
      "canonical_id": "comm-14",
      "title": "GDS moderated usability session",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Official research handbook",
      "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/using-moderated-usability-testing",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Task-specific success thresholds",
        "Results from any particular service",
        "Artificial tasks and dummy data may miss real contextual problems."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2017-02-21",
        "updated": "2017-10-03",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/using-moderated-usability-testing",
        "evidence_note": "Updates to this page explicitly labels Published 21 February 2017 and Last updated 3 October 2017; update history explains the change.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_explicit_publication_and_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-15",
      "canonical_id": "comm-15",
      "title": "IDEO.org field-learning download",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organization method guide",
      "source_url": "https://www.designkit.org/methods/download-your-learnings.html",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Formal validation rules",
        "Later synthesis and decision procedure",
        "Impressions must remain distinguishable from observations if the output will support consequential decisions."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.designkit.org/methods/download-your-learnings.html",
        "evidence_note": "Original Design Kit method page reopened. No publication/update label established in retrieved text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-16",
      "canonical_id": "comm-16",
      "title": "NN/g open card sorting",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Expert-authored method procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.nngroup.com/articles/card-sorting-definition/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Specific dataset and resulting taxonomy",
        "Implementation effects",
        "A plausible taxonomy is not proof that users can find items within a finished navigation interface."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2024-02-02",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.nngroup.com/articles/card-sorting-definition/",
        "evidence_note": "Author/title block displays February 2, 2024 and 2024-02-02. Recorded as displayed publication date; no separate update date found.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-17",
      "canonical_id": "comm-17",
      "title": "IBM user-journey playback",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organization framework and procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.ibm.com/training/enterprise-design-thinking/framework",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Formal acceptance thresholds",
        "Observed release outcomes",
        "A compelling story can conceal operational faults unless reviewers inspect realistic evidence."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.ibm.com/training/enterprise-design-thinking/framework",
        "evidence_note": "Original IBM framework page reopened. No page publication/update label established; dates from separate downloadable toolkit assets are not assigned to this page.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-18",
      "canonical_id": "comm-18",
      "title": "Atlassian's AI-assisted research-to-report workflow",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Atlassian employee showcasing its own Rovo Dev product; author’s LinkedIn repost is the same account and not independent corroboration.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party practitioner walkthrough",
      "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/blog/artificial-intelligence/research-with-rovo-dev",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/abbystiris_i-just-ran-some-user-research-for-an-initiative-activity-7447015507972583424-VXPV",
          "relationship": "Same Atlassian practitioner promotes and links the original article.",
          "assessment": "Reject as independent corroboration; different platform does not create a different evidence source.",
          "source_date": null,
          "source_date_type": "unknown",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": false,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": null,
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": null,
            "other_date_type": "unknown",
            "evidence_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/abbystiris_i-just-ran-some-user-research-for-an-initiative-activity-7447015507972583424-VXPV",
            "evidence_note": "Exact publication/update date not established; relative/indexed date not promoted.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        }
      ],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Raw study data",
        "Independent accuracy audit",
        "Prompt details",
        "Representativeness",
        "Strategic framing can bias synthesis; require searches for counterevidence and preserve unresolved findings.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2026-04-03",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/blog/artificial-intelligence/research-with-rovo-dev",
        "evidence_note": "Immediately below the article title is April 3, 2026, followed by Published In AI at Work. Recorded as displayed publication date; no separate update date found.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-19",
      "canonical_id": "comm-19",
      "title": "Atlassian DACI decision record",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Official facilitation procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/daci",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Whether listed benefits hold in practice",
        "Escalation when approver is unavailable",
        "Assigning roles cannot create authority absent from the organization."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/daci",
        "evidence_note": "Original DACI play reopened. No publication/update label established. Footer copyright 2025 is not a publication date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-21",
      "canonical_id": "comm-19",
      "title": "Atlassian DACI decision record",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Alias of comm-19. Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Official facilitation procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/daci",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Whether listed benefits hold in practice",
        "Escalation when approver is unavailable",
        "Assigning roles cannot create authority absent from the organization."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/daci",
        "evidence_note": "Original DACI play reopened. No publication/update label established. Footer copyright 2025 is not a publication date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      },
      "alias_only": true
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-20",
      "canonical_id": "comm-20",
      "title": "Atlassian project premortem",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Official facilitation procedure with illustrated team examples",
      "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/pre-mortem",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Mitigation follow-through",
        "Measured predictive accuracy",
        "Voting reflects the group's knowledge, not calibrated risk probability; rare severe risks can be outvoted."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/pre-mortem",
        "evidence_note": "Original premortem play reopened. No publication/update label established; timing estimates refer to the workshop, not publication.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-21",
      "canonical_id": "comm-21",
      "title": "Nesta theory-of-change construction",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Original foundation toolkit",
      "source_url": "https://www.nesta.org.uk/toolkit/theory-change/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Source-specific implementation outcomes",
        "Detailed falsification procedure",
        "The model is a hypothesis, not evidence that activities caused results."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.nesta.org.uk/toolkit/theory-change/",
        "evidence_note": "Original Nesta toolkit page reopened and checked for date labels. No publication/update date established; footer copyright year is excluded.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-22",
      "canonical_id": "comm-22",
      "title": "Outcome Harvesting for strategic learning",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Method-developer-contributed evaluation guide",
      "source_url": "https://www.betterevaluation.org/methods-approaches/approaches/outcome-harvesting",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Application-specific sampling",
        "Strength of causal inference in a particular harvest",
        "This is not experimental causal identification; competing explanations must remain visible."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.betterevaluation.org/methods-approaches/approaches/outcome-harvesting",
        "evidence_note": "Direct original-page opens returned an internal retrieval error in this pass; search returned original-page text but no page publication/update label. Dates 2012 and 2013 describe a cited external guide, not this page. Date remains unavailable.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "unavailable_retrieval_limited"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-23",
      "canonical_id": "comm-23",
      "title": "Zapier's AI proposal pressure-test",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Firsthand Zapier EA account of a custom GPT process. Brex and WorkOS sponsor the episode; neither is the evaluated GPT/workflow vendor. ChatPRD hosts the interview but this is not a ChatPRD customer-success case.",
      "source_relationship": "Original interview and published demonstration walkthrough",
      "source_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/how-i-ai/ea-ai-workflows-for-meetings-culture-and-strategy",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Full prompt",
        "False-positive critiques",
        "Independent assessment",
        "No video or system was run by this researcher",
        "An executive's preferences are not objective merit; a reviewer must avoid suppressing legitimate dissent."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-12-15",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/how-i-ai/ea-ai-workflows-for-meetings-culture-and-strategy",
        "evidence_note": "Original How I AI article header displays December 15, 2025 beside reading time. Article date is not independently verified recording or video-upload date; no separate update label found.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "comm-24",
      "canonical_id": "comm-24",
      "title": "Zapier's source-grounded strategy companion",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Firsthand Zapier EA account of NotebookLM practice. Episode sponsors Brex and WorkOS are unrelated to the evaluated tool; disclose commercial host context without inferring effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "Original interview and published demonstration walkthrough",
      "source_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/how-i-ai/ea-ai-workflows-for-meetings-culture-and-strategy",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Retrieval accuracy",
        "Access design",
        "Update ownership",
        "No video or system was run by this researcher",
        "Citations establish inspectability, not correctness; access control and version precedence must be designed."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-12-15",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.chatprd.ai/how-i-ai/ea-ai-workflows-for-meetings-culture-and-strategy",
        "evidence_note": "Same original How I AI article as comm-23: header displays December 15, 2025. Article date is not independently verified recording or video-upload date; no separate update label found.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:01:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-FIN-01",
      "canonical_id": "OP-FIN-01",
      "title": "GitLab balance-sheet reconciliation",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Organizational handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/finance/accounting/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Actual compliance and error rates",
        "Page mixes FloQast and BlackLine references; tool transition unresolved",
        "Balance definitions and accounting judgments do not transfer automatically."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-03-18",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/finance/accounting/",
        "evidence_note": "Page footer explicitly says Last modified March 18, 2026. This is page-level modification, not a verified change date for the reconciliation subsection. No publication date displayed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_publication_or_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-FIN-02",
      "canonical_id": "OP-FIN-02",
      "title": "GitLab supplier-invoice intake",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Organizational handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/finance/accounts-payable/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Observed cycle time",
        "Duplicate-detection implementation",
        "Approval thresholds, authority and payment rules are organization-specific."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-15",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/finance/accounts-payable/",
        "evidence_note": "Page footer explicitly says Last modified September 15, 2026. No publication date displayed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_publication_or_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-FIN-03",
      "canonical_id": "OP-FIN-03",
      "title": "Houston bank-to-ledger reconciliation",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Institutional procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.uhsystem.edu/resources/compliance-ethics/uhs-policies/sams/03-fiscal-affairs/03g06/index.php",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Matching algorithms",
        "Materiality thresholds",
        "Accounting timing and correction authority need local equivalents."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2022-01-10",
        "other_date_type": "policy_last_reviewed_or_revised",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.uhsystem.edu/resources/compliance-ethics/uhs-policies/sams/03-fiscal-affairs/03g06/index.php",
        "evidence_note": "Policy footer labels 01/10/2022 Last Reviewed/Revised; also labels 03/08/2002 Issued. US date ordering used. These are policy dates, not verified webpage publication or update dates.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_other_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-FIN-04",
      "canonical_id": "OP-FIN-04",
      "title": "State Tech journal-entry approval",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Institutional policy with procedure",
      "source_url": "https://statetechmo.edu/journal-entry-preparation-and-approval-policy/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Rejection/rework procedure",
        "Posting step",
        "Audit results",
        "Accounting correctness requires domain expertise beyond balanced fields."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2025-10-22",
        "other_date_type": "policy_effective_and_approval",
        "evidence_url": "https://statetechmo.edu/journal-entry-preparation-and-approval-policy/",
        "evidence_note": "Policy explicitly labels October 22, 2025 as both effective date and presidential approval date. Webpage publication/update dates not displayed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_other_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-FIN-05",
      "canonical_id": "OP-FIN-05",
      "title": "FinOps cost-anomaly investigation",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Practitioner foundation operating guidance",
      "source_url": "https://www.finops.org/framework/capabilities/anomaly-management/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Specific adopting organization",
        "Alert thresholds",
        "Measured effectiveness",
        "Spend, user demand and service value must be interpreted together."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.finops.org/framework/capabilities/anomaly-management/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-FIN-06",
      "canonical_id": "OP-FIN-06",
      "title": "Morgan Stanley meeting-to-CRM debrief",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "OpenAI customer story; customer press-release testimonials and anonymous discussion do not independently substantiate this specific Debrief workflow’s usefulness.",
      "source_relationship": "AI vendor practitioner case study",
      "source_url": "https://openai.com/index/morgan-stanley/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.morganstanley.com/press-releases/ai-at-morgan-stanley-debrief-launch",
          "relationship": "Customer corporate press release with selected named advisor testimonials.",
          "assessment": "Confirms announced deployment and reported use, but promotional launch selection is not independent social/practitioner validation.",
          "source_date": "2024-06-26",
          "source_date_type": "displayed_publication_date",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": false,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": "2024-06-26",
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": null,
            "other_date_type": null,
            "evidence_url": "https://www.morganstanley.com/press-releases/ai-at-morgan-stanley-debrief-launch",
            "evidence_note": "Displayed date read in original page. No separate update date established.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/CFP/comments/1x6axb0/morgan_stanley_debrief/",
          "relationship": "Anonymous commenters claiming advisor/current or former employee experience; identity unverified.",
          "assessment": "Mixed firsthand-sounding reports caution that internal search adoption differs from Debrief adoption. Does not establish this particular workflow’s effectiveness or reported adoption percentage.",
          "source_date": "2026-10-15",
          "source_date_type": "thread_start_date_in_search_result",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": false,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": null,
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": "2026-10-15",
            "other_date_type": "thread_start_date_in_search_result",
            "evidence_url": "https://www.reddit.com/r/CFP/comments/1x6axb0/morgan_stanley_debrief/",
            "evidence_note": "Search result displays thread date; direct thread chronology not independently audited.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        }
      ],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Exact CRM integration ordering",
        "Error rates",
        "Retention implementation",
        "Independent validation",
        "Consent, record access and regulated communication controls need separate design.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://openai.com/index/morgan-stanley/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-ENG-01",
      "canonical_id": "OP-ENG-01",
      "title": "PagerDuty NTP incident recovery",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Original practitioner incident account",
      "source_url": "https://sre.google/workbook/incident-response/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Exact configuration change",
        "Controlled comparison of response effectiveness",
        "Technical restoration is not equivalent to reversing financial transactions."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2017-10-06",
        "other_date_type": "reported_incident_date",
        "evidence_url": "https://sre.google/workbook/incident-response/",
        "evidence_note": "Case text dates the PagerDuty incident October 6, 2017. Footer gives book copyright 2018, which is not treated as webpage publication. Chapter publication and update dates not established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_other_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-ENG-02",
      "canonical_id": "OP-ENG-02",
      "title": "PagerDuty evidence-linked postmortem",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Organizational operating handbook",
      "source_url": "https://response.pagerduty.com/after/post_mortem_process/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Follow-up ticket completion rate",
        "Measured recurrence reduction",
        "Root-cause certainty may remain limited; legal accountability differs."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://response.pagerduty.com/after/post_mortem_process/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-ENG-03",
      "canonical_id": "OP-ENG-03",
      "title": "Amazon two-phase protocol rollout",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Original engineer walkthrough",
      "source_url": "https://builder.aws.com/content/3F04j2yRAAMBuPSPs50xwXZqg01/ensuring-rollback-safety-during-deployments",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Actual rollout metrics",
        "Universal bake duration",
        "Legal agreements and physical actions may be irreversible in ways software is not."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2019-12-05",
        "updated": "2019-12-05",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://builder.aws.com/content/3F04j2yRAAMBuPSPs50xwXZqg01/ensuring-rollback-safety-during-deployments",
        "evidence_note": "Article heading explicitly displays Published Dec 5, 2019 and Last modified Dec 5, 2019.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_publication_or_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-ENG-04",
      "canonical_id": "OP-ENG-04",
      "title": "Mozilla defect triage",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Project operating policy",
      "source_url": "https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/bug-mgmt/policies/triage-bugzilla.html",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Actual triage adherence",
        "Classifier accuracy",
        "Severity definitions and release consequences are product-specific."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/bug-mgmt/policies/triage-bugzilla.html",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-ENG-05",
      "canonical_id": "OP-ENG-05",
      "title": "GitLab scoped access request",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Organizational handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/eta/corporate-it/end-user-services/access-requests/frequently-asked-questions/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Provisioning verification detail",
        "Actual auto-close behavior",
        "Permission granting remains security-sensitive; no universal approval exemption."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-15",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/eta/corporate-it/end-user-services/access-requests/frequently-asked-questions/",
        "evidence_note": "Page footer explicitly says Last modified September 15, 2026. Original publication date not displayed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_publication_or_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-ENG-06",
      "canonical_id": "OP-ENG-06",
      "title": "Anthropic screenshot-guided cluster diagnosis",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Anthropic’s own Claude Code usage showcase; first-party employee account is not an exemption from the vendor filter.",
      "source_relationship": "AI vendor practitioner case study",
      "source_url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/how-anthropic-teams-use-claude-code",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Execution and verification detail",
        "Failure rate",
        "Independent corroboration",
        "Suggested commands still require authorized expert validation.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-07-24",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://claude.com/resources/articles/how-anthropic-teams-use-claude-code",
        "evidence_note": "Original Anthropic URL redirects to the publisher's Claude Resources article. Its byline Date is July 24, 2025; treated as article publication date. Separate update date not displayed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_publication_or_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-LEG-01",
      "canonical_id": "OP-LEG-01",
      "title": "ICO subject-access response preparation",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Regulator procedural guidance",
      "source_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/advice-for-small-organisations/subject-access-requests-sar/how-to-deal-with-a-request-for-information-a-step-by-step-guide/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Current applicability of every detail",
        "Search completeness",
        "Empirical success rate",
        "Legal disclosure rules must be reassessed; this is descriptive research, not current compliance advice."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/advice-for-small-organisations/subject-access-requests-sar/how-to-deal-with-a-request-for-information-a-step-by-step-guide/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-LEG-02",
      "canonical_id": "OP-LEG-02",
      "title": "ICO data-protection impact assessment",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Regulator procedural guidance",
      "source_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments-dpias/how-do-we-do-a-dpia/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Actual implementation evidence",
        "Review cadence",
        "Risk acceptance in a specific organization",
        "Privacy risk criteria and regulatory escalation do not transfer wholesale."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/accountability-and-governance/data-protection-impact-assessments-dpias/how-do-we-do-a-dpia/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-LEG-03",
      "canonical_id": "OP-LEG-03",
      "title": "Queen's contract-review intake and completion",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Institutional procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.queensu.ca/secretariat/legal-counsel/contract-review",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Substantive review checklist",
        "Negotiation steps",
        "Observed turnaround",
        "Legal review scope and signature authority cannot be replaced by generic approval."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.queensu.ca/secretariat/legal-counsel/contract-review",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-LEG-04",
      "canonical_id": "OP-LEG-04",
      "title": "Teachers College conflict-management plan",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Institutional procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.tc.columbia.edu/vpa/coi/management-procedures/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Enforcement results",
        "Specific mitigation options",
        "False-negative rate",
        "Do not infer that all conflicts are manageable or that screening proves absence."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.tc.columbia.edu/vpa/coi/management-procedures/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-LEG-05",
      "canonical_id": "OP-LEG-05",
      "title": "CWU litigation-hold preservation",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Institutional standard and procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.cwu.edu/about/offices/information-services/policy-management/standards-procedures/litigation-hold-standard.php",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Missing words in published text",
        "Actual preservation verification",
        "Implementation coverage",
        "Retention obligations and privilege require qualified legal oversight."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2026-06-15",
        "other_date_type": "standard_effective_and_review",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.cwu.edu/about/offices/information-services/policy-management/standards-procedures/litigation-hold-standard.php",
        "evidence_note": "Standard header says Effective June 15, 2026; history says Review/Effective Date 06/15/26. Scheduled review year 2030 is not a past update. Webpage publication/update dates not established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_other_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-LEG-06",
      "canonical_id": "OP-LEG-06",
      "title": "Anthropic cross-codebase compliance copy change",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Anthropic’s own Claude Code usage showcase; first-party employee account is not an exemption from the vendor filter.",
      "source_relationship": "AI vendor practitioner case study",
      "source_url": "https://www.anthropic.com/news/how-anthropic-teams-use-claude-code",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Search recall",
        "Regression checks",
        "Independent outcome validation",
        "Search coverage and legal sign-off cannot be assumed complete.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-07-24",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://claude.com/resources/articles/how-anthropic-teams-use-claude-code",
        "evidence_note": "Same original article as OP-ENG-06. Publisher redirect displays article Date July 24, 2025. No separate update date displayed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_publication_or_update"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-PROC-01",
      "canonical_id": "OP-PROC-01",
      "title": "Scottish technical-tender moderation",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Government procurement operating guidance",
      "source_url": "https://procurementjourney.scot/index.php/route-3/evaluation/technical-evaluation",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Inter-rater reliability",
        "Resolution method when consensus fails",
        "Procurement fairness and communication rules are jurisdiction-specific."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://procurementjourney.scot/index.php/route-3/evaluation/technical-evaluation",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-PROC-02",
      "canonical_id": "OP-PROC-02",
      "title": "Federal proposed-price analysis",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Government acquisition operating rule",
      "source_url": "https://www.acquisition.gov/far/15.404-1",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Actual decision trace",
        "Practitioner error rates",
        "Current rule-version date",
        "Statutory pricing requirements and procurement discretion remain domain-specific."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2026-03-13",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_FAC_edition_effective_date",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.acquisition.gov/far/15.404-1",
        "evidence_note": "Page header identifies FAC 2026-01, Effective Date 03/13/2026. This is the displayed FAR compilation edition, not proof this section changed on that date, and not webpage publication/update.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_other_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-PROC-03",
      "canonical_id": "OP-PROC-03",
      "title": "Logistics Cluster blind stock spot-check",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Humanitarian operating guide",
      "source_url": "https://log.logcluster.org/en/monitoring-and-counting",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Downstream correction approval",
        "Observed loss reduction",
        "Physical movement controls differ from continuously changing digital state."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://log.logcluster.org/en/monitoring-and-counting",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-PROC-04",
      "canonical_id": "OP-PROC-04",
      "title": "Tennessee receipt-to-invoice match",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Institutional procedure",
      "source_url": "https://policy.tennessee.edu/procedure/procedure-for-fi0405-procurement-receiving-materials/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "How disputes ultimately close",
        "System enforcement detail",
        "Service acceptance may require qualitative criteria beyond quantities."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2024-08-30",
        "other_date_type": "procedure_effective",
        "evidence_url": "https://policy.tennessee.edu/procedure/procedure-for-fi0405-procurement-receiving-materials/",
        "evidence_note": "Procedure footer explicitly says Version 1, Effective 08/30/2024. No separate webpage publication/update date displayed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "verified_other_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-PROC-05",
      "canonical_id": "OP-PROC-05",
      "title": "Scottish supplier-performance correction",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Government procurement operating guidance",
      "source_url": "https://www.procurementjourney.scot/route-2/contract-and-supplier-management/contract-and-supplier-management-guidance-non-procurement",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Outcome metrics",
        "Evidence needed to verify correction",
        "Detailed escalation ladder",
        "Contract remedies and supplier negotiations do not map directly to internal work."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.procurementjourney.scot/route-2/contract-and-supplier-management/contract-and-supplier-management-guidance-non-procurement",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "OP-PROC-06",
      "canonical_id": "OP-PROC-06",
      "title": "Scottish contract-variation control",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Government procurement operating guidance",
      "source_url": "https://www.procurementjourney.scot/index.php/route-3/contract-and-supplier-management/variations-extensions-amendments",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Actual organizational implementation",
        "Time to approval",
        "Validated effect on scope creep",
        "Negotiation rights and statutory modification tests cannot be generalized."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.procurementjourney.scot/index.php/route-3/contract-and-supplier-management/variations-extensions-amendments",
        "evidence_note": "Original page reopened and accessible page text checked. No explicit publication or last-update date found. Access/crawl dates and generic copyright notices are not publication dates; hidden metadata or complete version history not verified.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:44Z",
        "status": "not_found_in_accessible_source"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-01",
      "canonical_id": "svc-01",
      "title": "Prepare and iterate a discovery conversation",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/playbook/discovery/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Actual conversion effects",
        "Question selection algorithm",
        "Transfer the inquiry loop, not sales qualification criteria."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-24",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/playbook/discovery/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-24. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-02",
      "canonical_id": "svc-02",
      "title": "Maintain a reviewed opportunity plan",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/command-of-the-message/command-plan/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Review effectiveness",
        "Actual plan examples",
        "Deal thresholds and forecast cadence do not generalize."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-24",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/command-of-the-message/command-plan/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-24. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-03",
      "canonical_id": "svc-03",
      "title": "Hand off a qualified opportunity",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/sales-development/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Observed handoff failures",
        "Exact contents for every handoff type",
        "Do not import prospect criteria into operational requests."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-29",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/sales/sales-development/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-29. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-04",
      "canonical_id": "svc-04",
      "title": "Enrich an inbound lead and attach context",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Zapier implementation tutorial showcases the seller’s automation product; no independent practitioner use of this particular workflow established.",
      "source_relationship": "Vendor-authored implementation tutorial",
      "source_url": "https://zapier.com/blog/enrich-leads-with-openai/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Factual validation method",
        "Runtime error rate",
        "Human review on each live run",
        "The article does not establish reliable live website retrieval or factual accuracy.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2023-05",
        "updated": "2025-02",
        "other_date": "2025-02-19",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_byline_date",
        "evidence_url": "https://zapier.com/blog/enrich-leads-with-openai/",
        "evidence_note": "Original article footer states first published May 2023 and most recently updated February 2025. Header/byline displays February 19, 2025. Update date is kept at month precision rather than assuming the byline is an exact update timestamp.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_partial_precision"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-05",
      "canonical_id": "svc-05",
      "title": "Analyze sales calls for manager enablement",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Zapier sales-team story showcases its own Tables/automation product; employee social posts do not establish independent corroboration.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://zapier.com/blog/zapier-sales-team-upmarket/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Prompt",
        "Scoring rubric",
        "Validation",
        "Privacy controls",
        "Measured effectiveness",
        "Coaching evidence must not silently become automated personnel evaluation.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-05-21",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://zapier.com/blog/zapier-sales-team-upmarket/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2025-05-21; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_published_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-06",
      "canonical_id": "svc-06",
      "title": "Find published answers for prospect questions",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Zapier own-product use showcase; no independent practitioner corroboration of this retrieval workflow established.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://zapier.com/blog/how-zapier-uses-ai/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Ranking",
        "Freshness checks",
        "Failure behavior",
        "Relevance does not establish that a source answers the question.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2023-06",
        "updated": "2026-01",
        "other_date": "2026-01-19",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_byline_date",
        "evidence_url": "https://zapier.com/blog/how-zapier-uses-ai/",
        "evidence_note": "Original article footer states first published June 2023 and most recently updated January 2026. Header/byline displays January 19, 2026. Update date retains the explicitly stated month precision; the header date is separate.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_partial_precision"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-07",
      "canonical_id": "svc-07",
      "title": "Triage a support request to the right route",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/support/workflows/ticket_triage/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Routing accuracy",
        "Ambiguous entitlement resolution",
        "Eligibility errors can deny service; transfer needs local policy and review."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-07-29",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/support/workflows/ticket_triage/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-07-29. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-08",
      "canonical_id": "svc-08",
      "title": "Coordinate an account escalation through agreed closure",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/customer-experience/csm/escalations/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Real resolution duration",
        "Effect of cadence",
        "Urgency and communication rights must be adapted."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-24",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/customer-experience/csm/escalations/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-24. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-09",
      "canonical_id": "svc-09",
      "title": "Respond to a customer emergency",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/support/workflows/customer_emergencies_workflows/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Outcome rates",
        "Detailed technical diagnosis for individual incidents",
        "Software recovery actions and entitlement rules do not transfer."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-24",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/support/workflows/customer_emergencies_workflows/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-24. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-10",
      "canonical_id": "svc-10",
      "title": "Turn customer feedback into prioritized improvements",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Cars Commerce practitioner describes support-feedback practices on Help Scout’s blog; distinguish these from adjacent Help Scout product recommendations.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://www.helpscout.com/blog/customer-feedback/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Full prioritization rubric",
        "Implementation lead time",
        "Self-reported process; no causal evidence that the method produced a particular improvement."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-10-20",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.helpscout.com/blog/customer-feedback/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2025-10-20; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_published_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-11",
      "canonical_id": "svc-11",
      "title": "Draft and approve a public incident update",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Zapier own-product use showcase; no independent practitioner corroboration of this incident-update workflow established.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://zapier.com/blog/how-zapier-uses-ai/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Rejection handling",
        "Approver identity rules",
        "Retry safety",
        "Measured accuracy",
        "Authority to publish and verified facts must remain explicit.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2023-06",
        "updated": "2026-01",
        "other_date": "2026-01-19",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_byline_date",
        "evidence_url": "https://zapier.com/blog/how-zapier-uses-ai/",
        "evidence_note": "Original article footer states first published June 2023 and most recently updated January 2026. Header/byline displays January 19, 2026. Update date retains the explicitly stated month precision; the header date is separate.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_partial_precision"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-12",
      "canonical_id": "svc-12",
      "title": "Investigate a service complaint and communicate findings",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Public ombudsman model procedure",
      "source_url": "https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/sites/default/files/MCHP_NHS_CS_Dec_2022.pdf",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Local adoption",
        "Actual case outcomes",
        "Current superseding procedure",
        "Publication date independently verified from document text or official listing",
        "Healthcare law, confidentiality and remedy authority cannot be copied into another context."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2022-12",
        "other_date_type": "filename_indicated_month",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/sites/default/files/MCHP_NHS_CS_Dec_2022.pdf",
        "evidence_note": "Original PDF reopened; filename MCHP_NHS_CS_Dec_2022.pdf indicates December 2022. No publication or revision date verified in extracted PDF text; text search for 2022 returns no match. The filename hint is not a verified publication date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "filename_hint_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-13",
      "canonical_id": "svc-13",
      "title": "Define a role before assessing applicants",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/hiring-process/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Current process",
        "Actual bias reduction",
        "Hiring fairness and lawful criteria need specialist judgment."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2018-03-14",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/hiring-process/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2018-03-14; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_published_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-14",
      "canonical_id": "svc-14",
      "title": "Prepare a candidate-facing question guide",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/buffer-q-a-doc/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Fixed maintenance cadence",
        "Formal factual approval process",
        "Measured interview impact",
        "No formal approval process or fixed maintenance cadence is established."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2026-07-28",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/buffer-q-a-doc/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2026-07-28; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_published_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-15",
      "canonical_id": "svc-15",
      "title": "Reconcile independent performance reviews",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/performance-reviews-mixed-feelings/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Measured fairness",
        "Current process",
        "All calibration details",
        "Employment consequences and private personnel data require stronger safeguards than ordinary document synthesis."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2023-08-10",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://buffer.com/resources/performance-reviews-mixed-feelings/",
        "evidence_note": "Original page's article header/byline displays 2023-08-10; treated as the displayed article publication date. No distinct last-updated date found in retrieved text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_published_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-16",
      "canonical_id": "svc-16",
      "title": "Track onboarding obligations to closure",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/general-onboarding/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Audit exception outcomes",
        "Completion quality",
        "Automatic closure is not evidence of actual completion."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-13",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/general-onboarding/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-13. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-17",
      "canonical_id": "svc-17",
      "title": "Coordinate a voluntary departure and access closure",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/offboarding/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Current jurisdictional requirements",
        "Actual audit compliance",
        "Employment decisions and access revocation require authorized human control."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-09-13",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/people-group/offboarding/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-09-13. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-18",
      "canonical_id": "svc-18",
      "title": "Evaluate a realistic work sample with feedback",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party hiring process documentation",
      "source_url": "https://automattic.com/work-with-us/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Scoring rubric",
        "Inter-rater reliability",
        "Compensation terms for each test",
        "Employment selection needs fair access, accommodations and lawful review."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://automattic.com/work-with-us/",
        "evidence_note": "Original source page retrieved and inspected for article-level publication/update dates. No publication or last-updated date established from rendered text. Copyright years, linked article dates, relative search dates and crawl dates are excluded.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "not_found"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-19",
      "canonical_id": "svc-19",
      "title": "Turn a retrospective into assigned improvements",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Government service manual",
      "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/agile-tools-techniques",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Action completion rate",
        "Specific facilitation conflicts",
        "An action list without follow-through is not evidence of improvement."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2016-02-16",
        "updated": "2026-03-31",
        "other_date": "2016-01-05",
        "other_date_type": "conflicting_first_publication_history_entry",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/agile-tools-techniques",
        "evidence_note": "Original GOV.UK Updates to this page labels Published: 16 February 2016 and Last updated: 31 March 2026. The same history lists 5 January 2016 as Guidance first published. Both indicators are preserved; original publication conflict remains unresolved.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_dates_with_publication_conflict"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-20",
      "canonical_id": "svc-20",
      "title": "Maintain an evidence-informed roadmap",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "Government service manual",
      "source_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/developing-a-roadmap",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Specific prioritization method",
        "Outcome results",
        "Do not treat provisional roadmap dates as delivery guarantees."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2017-11-16",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/agile-delivery/developing-a-roadmap",
        "evidence_note": "Original GOV.UK page explicitly labels Published: 16 November 2017. No last-updated field appears in retrieved text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_published_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-22",
      "canonical_id": "svc-22",
      "title": "Map dependencies and assign review loops",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public team playbook",
      "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/dependency-mapping",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Observed dependency failures",
        "Acceptance protocol",
        "A diagram does not verify that counterpart teams have accepted obligations."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/dependency-mapping",
        "evidence_note": "Original source page retrieved and inspected for article-level publication/update dates. No publication or last-updated date established from rendered text. Copyright years, linked article dates, relative search dates and crawl dates are excluded.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "not_found"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-23",
      "canonical_id": "svc-23",
      "title": "Review a purchase request through an approval queue",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public handbook",
      "source_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/business-technology/enterprise-applications/guides/zip-guide/",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Full approval matrix",
        "Actual compliance",
        "Approval authority, financial limits and segregation of duties remain local."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": "2026-05-27",
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/business-technology/enterprise-applications/guides/zip-guide/",
        "evidence_note": "Original handbook footer explicitly states Last modified 2026-05-27. Original publication date is not provided in retrieved text. This is page-level modification, not proof that this workflow changed on that date; several entries concern handbook-wide renaming.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "verified_updated_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "svc-24",
      "canonical_id": "svc-24",
      "title": "Audit recent decisions to reduce avoidable delay",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "ordinary_documented_operating_procedure",
      "reason": "Institutional or method-author operating guidance documents this procedure; no tool-seller customer-success claim is admitted.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party public team playbook",
      "source_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/decision-making-retro",
      "original_input": "repo-handoff/workflow-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Model and retrieval setup",
        "Independent effect of AI",
        "Actual adoption",
        "Self-reflection cannot by itself grant permission or establish causal improvement."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/decision-making-retro",
        "evidence_note": "Original source page retrieved and inspected for article-level publication/update dates. No publication or last-updated date established from rendered text. Copyright years, linked article dates, relative search dates and crawl dates are excluded.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:27Z",
        "status": "not_found"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC01",
      "canonical_id": "SOC01",
      "title": "Content Repurposing FACTORY",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Public creator-owned static template supports mechanism and a concrete failure finding: prompts instruct invented metrics. Eligible only for cautionary anatomy, never as a successful/ready-to-copy workflow.",
      "source_relationship": "Promotes implementation services, community and newsletter; sponsorship not established.",
      "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9gwOtjiYnI",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "The exact public template is available and statically inspected; both platform prompts instruct fabrication of metrics. Availability does not make the template safe to reuse.",
        "No transcript inspected",
        "No performance evidence",
        "Both prompts instruct fabrication of quantitative impact.",
        "Schema repair validates format, not truth.",
        "No social publishing, factual checker, or approval node found.",
        "First-subtitle access assumes subtitles exist.",
        "Sticky notes say two options; executable schemas specify three.",
        "Video fetch failed; 25+ assets claim unsupported by this graph."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "cautionary_mechanism_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": true,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-07-09",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9gwOtjiYnI",
        "evidence_note": "Initial public search index returned YouTube title, creator, description and Published: 2025-07-09. Direct video fetch failed. Exact-video-ID/date search on final check returned no results; initial indexed retrieval is retained, not upgraded.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "provisional_indexed_original_metadata"
      },
      "enrichment_source_date_entries": [
        {
          "published": "2025-07-09",
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9gwOtjiYnI",
          "evidence_note": "Initial public search index returned YouTube title, creator, description and Published: 2025-07-09. Direct video fetch failed. Exact-video-ID/date search on final check returned no results; initial indexed retrieval is retained, not upgraded.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
          "status": "provisional_indexed_original_metadata"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://github.com/lucaswalter/n8n-ai-automations/blob/main/content_repurposing_factory.json",
          "evidence_note": "Static public template retrieved. No creation/update timestamp established; current template may differ from original video.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "unknown_date"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://github.com/lucaswalter/n8n-ai-automations",
          "evidence_note": "README links exact original YouTube video to template; no README publication/update date established.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "unknown_date"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": "2025-07-09T14:35:30Z",
          "other_date_type": "latest_file_commit_committer_timestamp",
          "evidence_url": "https://api.github.com/repos/lucaswalter/n8n-ai-automations/commits?path=content_repurposing_factory.json&per_page=1",
          "evidence_note": "GitHub commits API returns this latest file commit; author timestamp 2025-07-09T14:35:17Z. Commit message says adds workflow. Neither is a verified YouTube upload date.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:18:20.211974+00:00",
          "status": "verified_repository_commit_timestamp"
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_evidence": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/lucaswalter/n8n-ai-automations/blob/main/content_repurposing_factory.json",
          "inspection": "All nodes, parameters and connections read as static JSON; no workflow execution.",
          "locators": [
            "form_trigger",
            "scrape_youtube_video",
            "set_youtube_details",
            "build_twitter_prompt: STEP 1, item 3",
            "build_linked_in_prompt: STEP 1, item 3",
            "tweet_parser",
            "linked_in_parser",
            "send_tweet_msg",
            "send_linked_in_post_msg"
          ]
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/lucaswalter/n8n-ai-automations",
          "inspection": "README explicitly links this filename to original video."
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_reconciled_at": "2026-10-18T03:28:28.551490+00:00",
      "verified_template_version": {
        "commit_sha": "6729938f1ca6978fa9ddc20549a9805c24a2c58b",
        "commit_url": "https://github.com/lucaswalter/n8n-ai-automations/commit/6729938f1ca6978fa9ddc20549a9805c24a2c58b",
        "pinned_file_url": "https://github.com/lucaswalter/n8n-ai-automations/blob/6729938f1ca6978fa9ddc20549a9805c24a2c58b/content_repurposing_factory.json",
        "sha256": "e1b1e9a5944f22a1e849438a9376d2e051b2251b2d9f953ca9ba7600c7480eb8",
        "verification": "Pinned raw file bytes exactly match inspected main-branch file.",
        "license_and_redistribution": "Full upstream JSON retained as local research evidence only; do not include in deliverable/repository without separate license review."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC02",
      "canonical_id": "SOC02",
      "title": "Build the Context That Makes AI Data Agents Reliable",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Creator transcript supports a reported small comparison and shared-definition practice; training promotion is disclosed, no independent trial or causal effectiveness established.",
      "source_relationship": "Free workshop promotes paid courses; no separate sponsor established.",
      "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsaPQ5eQUyA",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Underlying evaluation artifacts not inspected",
        "Consistency does not establish correctness",
        "Held-out-query evaluation recommended, not demonstrated in the reported comparison",
        "Reported agreement across 15 defined runs is consistency, not verified correctness.",
        "Underlying runs and held-out artifacts unavailable.",
        "Wrong join cardinality can inflate totals despite correct metric meaning.",
        "Incorrect historical queries contaminate examples.",
        "Unstructured context can contain competing definitions.",
        "Model names in auto-transcript may be transcription artifacts; do not normalize them into verified model IDs."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": true,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsaPQ5eQUyA",
        "evidence_note": "YouTube upload/update dates remain unknown. August 5 is the workshop event date in companion sources, not established upload date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "unknown_original_date"
      },
      "enrichment_source_date_entries": [
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsaPQ5eQUyA",
          "evidence_note": "YouTube upload/update dates remain unknown. August 5 is the workshop event date in companion sources, not established upload date.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
          "status": "unknown_original_date"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": "2026-08-05",
          "other_date_type": "workshop_event_date",
          "evidence_url": "https://aianalystlab.ai/workshops/build-the-context-that-makes-ai-data-agents-reliable/",
          "evidence_note": "Header states workshop event date, not article or YouTube publication date.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "verified_event_date_only"
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_evidence": [
        {
          "url": "https://aianalystlab.ai/workshops/build-the-context-that-makes-ai-data-agents-reliable/",
          "inspection": "Relevant complete transcript discussion read, including comparison, semantic layers, examples, ambiguity and human approval.",
          "locators": [
            "lines 37–54: no live demo; 15 undefined versus 15 defined runs reported",
            "lines 70–86: metric specification and cardinality",
            "lines 103–119: examples and narrow gates",
            "lines 130–149: synthesis into reviewed definitions"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_reconciled_at": "2026-10-18T03:28:28.551490+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC03",
      "canonical_id": "SOC03",
      "title": "LLM Wiki",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Creator’s original gist supports an abstract operating pattern and author-reported use; not a tested packaged build or proof of effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "No sponsorship disclosed in gist.",
      "source_url": "https://x.com/karpathy/status/2039805659525644595",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "No benchmark supplied",
        "No guaranteed completeness or update correctness",
        "Ingest/query/lint are proposed workflows, not a benchmarked packaged system.",
        "Raw sources and generated synthesis are separate layers.",
        "Local images require separate inspection from Markdown text.",
        "Author claims of negligible maintenance cost or reliable updating lack measured support.",
        "X access/date remains unverified."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": true,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://x.com/karpathy/status/2039805659525644595",
        "evidence_note": "Original X fetch returned 403. Secondary sources disagree about post timing; no original X publication/update date established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "unknown_original_date"
      },
      "enrichment_source_date_entries": [
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://x.com/karpathy/status/2039805659525644595",
          "evidence_note": "Original X fetch returned 403. Secondary sources disagree about post timing; no original X publication/update date established.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
          "status": "unknown_original_date"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": "2026-04-04T16:25",
          "other_date_type": "gist_creation_timestamp_timezone_unspecified",
          "evidence_url": "https://gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6bf555914893e9891c11519de94f",
          "evidence_note": "Gist header creation timestamp; timezone unspecified. Original X date not inferred.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "verified_gist_creation_only"
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_evidence": [
        {
          "url": "https://gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6bf555914893e9891c11519de94f",
          "inspection": "Full original gist body read; third-party comments excluded.",
          "locators": [
            "Architecture",
            "Operations",
            "Indexing and logging",
            "Tips and tricks",
            "Note"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_reconciled_at": "2026-10-18T03:28:28.551490+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC04",
      "canonical_id": "SOC04",
      "title": "Personal cross-app agent stack",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "sponsored_or_uncertain_lead",
      "reason": "Original X post was not directly accessible and indexed account could not be independently reproduced; demo not observed and usefulness claim unverified.",
      "source_relationship": "No sponsorship disclosed in retrieved post.",
      "source_url": "https://x.com/Blum_OG/status/2060771504288071776",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "No repo inspected",
        "No failure recovery, identity-resolution or audit details",
        "No independent timing evidence",
        "Exclusion is an evidence/provenance decision, not a finding that the technique cannot work."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2026-05-30",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://x.com/Blum_OG/status/2060771504288071776",
        "evidence_note": "Initial searches returned original-post text and displayed date May 30, 2026 (5:13 PM; timezone unspecified). Direct fetch returned 403. Independent auditor could not reproduce exact-ID retrieval. Retained as indexed-only provisional date, not direct primary verification.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "provisional_indexed_original_metadata_not_independently_reproduced"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC05",
      "canonical_id": "SOC05",
      "title": "Claude Code SEO agent",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "sponsored_or_uncertain_lead",
      "reason": "Self-promotional engagement-funnel post, available only via index; implementation and claimed ranking/subscription outcomes not verified.",
      "source_relationship": "Self-promotional engagement funnel; no separate sponsor disclosed.",
      "source_url": "https://x.com/mikefutia/status/2043357536448041327",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Playbook gated behind engagement/DM",
        "No repo or results inspected",
        "No causal attribution of ranking changes",
        "Exclusion is an evidence/provenance decision, not a finding that the technique cannot work."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2026-04-12",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://x.com/mikefutia/status/2043357536448041327",
        "evidence_note": "Initial search index displayed original X post and April 12, 2026 date (3:56 PM; timezone unspecified). Direct fetch returned 403; no update date established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "provisional_indexed_original_metadata"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC06",
      "canonical_id": "SOC06",
      "title": "The Future of RAG is Agentic",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Creator-owned transcript supports retrieval mechanics and reported failure/retest. GPUStack sponsorship is an isolated ad at 21:36–23:32; demonstrated stack uses OpenAI and Supabase, not GPUStack. Retain mechanism evidence, not sponsor or performance claims.",
      "source_relationship": "Creator-owned technical walkthrough; GPUStack sponsorship disclosed in separate ad segment at 21:36–23:32. Demonstrated OpenAI/Supabase retrieval mechanics are not a GPUStack product showcase.",
      "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R-ff4ZMLC8",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Creator-hosted timestamped raw transcript was recovered and read; video playback and independent execution were not performed.",
        "No general accuracy benchmark reviewed",
        "Illustrative pretested example, not a held-out benchmark.",
        "Creator acknowledges chunking/retrieval changes might also fix the example.",
        "Zero-vector fallback keeps processing moving but can degrade retrieval.",
        "No independent success-rate or speed evidence.",
        "Page fetch reconstructs stored content; it is not necessarily a fresh website fetch."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": true,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2025-01-15",
        "other_date_type": "creator_summary_reported_video_publication_date_disputed",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R-ff4ZMLC8",
        "evidence_note": "Creator-owned summary reports January 15; secondary Glasp index reports January 16. Direct original-video publication metadata was not established, so published remains null.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "unresolved_conflicting_reported_dates"
      },
      "enrichment_source_date_entries": [
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": "2025-01-15",
          "other_date_type": "creator_summary_reported_video_publication_date_disputed",
          "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R-ff4ZMLC8",
          "evidence_note": "Creator-owned summary reports January 15; secondary Glasp index reports January 16. Direct original-video publication metadata was not established, so published remains null.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
          "status": "unresolved_conflicting_reported_dates"
        },
        {
          "published": "2025-01-15",
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": "2026-07-21",
          "other_date_type": "transcript_fetched_at",
          "evidence_url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coleam00/cole-medin-knowledge-base/main/raw/the-future-of-rag-is-agentic-learn-this-strategy-now.md",
          "evidence_note": "Creator-hosted transcript front matter reports source video published date; not independently checked against YouTube. Fetched timestamp belongs to transcript ingestion.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "creator_transcript_reports_original_date"
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_evidence": [
        {
          "url": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/coleam00/cole-medin-knowledge-base/main/raw/the-future-of-rag-is-agentic-learn-this-strategy-now.md",
          "inspection": "Complete relevant timestamped walkthrough read as transcript; no video playback.",
          "locators": [
            "19:08: summaries use first 1,000 characters",
            "20:09: embedding-error fallback returns zero vector",
            "32:20: five chunks and source filter",
            "34:45–35:47: incomplete weather example",
            "36:33–37:03: acknowledges alternative RAG improvements",
            "39:22–41:21: whole-page retrieval and reported retest",
            "21:36: GPUStack sponsorship disclosure"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_reconciled_at": "2026-10-18T03:28:28.551490+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC07",
      "canonical_id": "SOC07",
      "title": "Meeting-to-task agent with Airtable and Fireflies",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Named creator’s public n8n community template supports specified automation mechanics; vendor hosting does not by itself make it a vendor-authored customer success story. No run or usefulness verification.",
      "source_relationship": "Vendor-hosted community template; no separate sponsorship disclosed.",
      "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TyX7G00x3A",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Only relative update date shown",
        "Workflow JSON not executed",
        "Owner/date ambiguity, duplicate events, retries and consent not specified",
        "No approval or duplicate-event controls documented in guide.",
        "Exact task schema, recipient resolution and date inference not established from primary page.",
        "No measured meeting outcome or execution verified.",
        "Underlying primary JSON unavailable in inspected page; third-party copies not treated as creator-verified code.",
        "Notification and calendar actions are consequential outputs, not merely summaries."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": true,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TyX7G00x3A",
        "evidence_note": "Exact original video publication/update dates unavailable. Final exact-ID/date search returned no results. Companion relative update age is deliberately not converted to a date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "unknown_original_date"
      },
      "enrichment_source_date_entries": [
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TyX7G00x3A",
          "evidence_note": "Exact original video publication/update dates unavailable. Final exact-ID/date search returned no results. Companion relative update age is deliberately not converted to a date.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
          "status": "unknown_original_date"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": "8 months ago",
          "other_date_type": "relative_last_update_label",
          "evidence_url": "https://n8n.io/workflows/2683-ai-agent-for-project-management-and-meetings-with-airtable-and-fireflies/",
          "evidence_note": "Page displays relative Last update 8 months ago; do not convert rounded relative label into exact date.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "relative_label_only"
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_evidence": [
        {
          "url": "https://n8n.io/workflows/2683-ai-agent-for-project-management-and-meetings-with-airtable-and-fireflies/",
          "inspection": "Entire creator-authored guide and setup section read.",
          "locators": [
            "Video Guide",
            "What this workflow does",
            "Setup: steps 1–6"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_reconciled_at": "2026-10-18T03:28:28.551490+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC08",
      "canonical_id": "SOC08",
      "title": "Teams discussion to shared diagram, requirements and slides",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Explicit Miro sales-team author describes its product demo; no independent practitioner use or usefulness evidence established.",
      "source_relationship": "Explicit vendor sales-team author. Treat benefits as vendor claims.",
      "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc9b90is4mQ",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "No independent demo observation or measured outcomes",
        "Final validation gates belong to recommended framework",
        "Article says PR while video title says PRD",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc9b90is4mQ",
        "evidence_note": "Original video upload/update dates unavailable; exact-ID/date search returned no results. October 2 belongs to companion article last-publication label.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "unknown_original_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC09",
      "canonical_id": "SOC09",
      "title": "Build an AI Analyst with Claude Code",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Brex data practitioner describes Claude Code mechanics. Glue sponsorship is a separate ad for another product; Claude team recommended the guest, so vendor selection influence is disclosed. Retain reported mechanics only, not independent validation.",
      "source_relationship": "Creator article explicitly sponsored by Glue.",
      "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3vmxY7mkNQ",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Article partly paywalled",
        "Video not watched",
        "End-to-end autonomous intervention not established"
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3vmxY7mkNQ",
        "evidence_note": "Original YouTube identity verified through creator link, but accessible video page did not expose upload/update metadata. January 18 dates creator companion article.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "unknown_original_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC10",
      "canonical_id": "SOC10",
      "title": "Ramp product-shaping skill",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Ramp CPO describes an internal Claude Code product-shaping skill. Granola partnership is a separate ad; the retained skill is not a Granola product showcase. Retain public mechanics with sponsorship disclosure.",
      "source_relationship": "Public article discloses Granola partnership; guest is describing own employer.",
      "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBqT2PHWdBg",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Full skill paywalled",
        "Speed and adoption claims not validated",
        "No research scoring rubric inspected"
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBqT2PHWdBg",
        "evidence_note": "Original YouTube identity verified through creator link, but accessible video page did not expose upload/update metadata. March 15 dates creator companion article.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "unknown_original_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC11",
      "canonical_id": "SOC11",
      "title": "Workflow discovery app for technical writing",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Consultancy showcases an AI discovery application being considered for its services; published screenshots show a prototype, not independent client use or usefulness.",
      "source_relationship": "Consultancy self-promotion; no external sponsorship disclosed.",
      "source_url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/2026/03/mapping-the-path-how-were-using-ai-to-understand-technical-writing-workflows/",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "No public code or evaluation",
        "No verified social video",
        "Self-report may omit actual exceptions",
        "Example durations and monthly volume are screenshot inputs/outputs, not measured productivity results.",
        "Screenshots do not prove persistence, adaptation across users or report download behavior.",
        "Article positions app for initial discovery or unavailable expert interviews; expert interviewing remains preferred.",
        "No public evaluation or code established; not an X/YouTube case.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": true,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2026-03-04",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/2026/03/mapping-the-path-how-were-using-ai-to-understand-technical-writing-workflows/",
        "evidence_note": "Primary builder article header explicitly dates March 4, 2026. No separate update date displayed. This is an article rather than a video or X post.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "verified_primary_article_publication"
      },
      "enrichment_source_date_entries": [
        {
          "published": "2026-03-04",
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/2026/03/mapping-the-path-how-were-using-ai-to-understand-technical-writing-workflows/",
          "evidence_note": "Primary article header gives March 4, 2026.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "verified_primary_article_publication"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/discovery1a.png",
          "evidence_note": "Linked screenshot inspected; filename path is not treated as publication metadata.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "unknown_asset_publication_date"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/discovery2.png",
          "evidence_note": "Linked screenshot inspected; filename path is not treated as publication metadata.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "unknown_asset_publication_date"
        },
        {
          "published": null,
          "updated": null,
          "other_date": null,
          "other_date_type": null,
          "evidence_url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/discovery1.png",
          "evidence_note": "Linked screenshot inspected; filename path is not treated as publication metadata.",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:43.174030+00:00",
          "status": "unknown_asset_publication_date"
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_evidence": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/2026/03/mapping-the-path-how-were-using-ai-to-understand-technical-writing-workflows/",
          "inspection": "Full article read; three linked original screenshots downloaded and visually inspected. Screenshots are published examples, not a live session."
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/discovery1a.png",
          "locators": [
            "Follow-up clarifies meaning of frequent; sidebar retains pending uncertainty"
          ]
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/discovery2.png",
          "locators": [
            "Stage cards show role and trigger; final chat lists four stages"
          ]
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.cherryleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/discovery1.png",
          "locators": [
            "Summary records tools, volume and review bottleneck"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "enrichment_reconciled_at": "2026-10-18T03:28:28.551490+00:00"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOC12",
      "canonical_id": "SOC12",
      "title": "How I Turn Meetings Into Project Plans",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "sponsored_or_uncertain_lead",
      "reason": "Krisp-sponsored secondary-mirror discovery lead; original account and successful build were not verified.",
      "source_relationship": "Mirrored description explicitly says sponsored by Krisp and #ad.",
      "source_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8iU1-DSwi4",
      "original_input": "social-builds.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Primary YouTube content fetch failed",
        "No transcript or actual demonstration inspected",
        "Exclusion is an evidence/provenance decision, not a finding that the technique cannot work."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8iU1-DSwi4",
        "evidence_note": "Original video publication/update dates remain unverified. October 14 is reported by a secondary mirror, retained separately as provisional; no video playback.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:00:07Z",
        "status": "unknown_original_date_secondary_lead_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-01",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-01",
      "title": "Toyota turns mail-arrival polling into shared ownership",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party staff interview",
      "source_url": "https://toyotatimes.jp/en/series/Imaginative_and_creative/003.html",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Missed notification rate",
        "Reliability of completion status versus claim",
        "Measured time savings",
        "A claim is not proof of delivery; escalation for unclaimed work remains a design question."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2025-03-04",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://toyotatimes.jp/en/series/Imaginative_and_creative/003.html",
        "evidence_note": "Page displays 2025-03-04 without separately labeling publication versus update.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-02",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-02",
      "title": "Bosch preserves repair knowledge through contextual troubleshooting",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Bosch describes its Shopfloor Agent while also marketing that system externally; seller’s own factory use cannot independently corroborate product success.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party staff interviews",
      "source_url": "https://www.bosch.com/stories/agentic-ai-manufacturing-production/",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Failure rate",
        "Operator authority and safety checks",
        "Measurement behind savings claims",
        "Publication date",
        "Physical safety and specialist repair authorization cannot be inferred from a conversational suggestion.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2025",
        "other_date_type": "reported_deployment_period_end_of_year",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.bosch.com/stories/agentic-ai-manufacturing-production/",
        "evidence_note": "No article date established. Body says use in own plants and external offering since the end of 2025; this is deployment context, not publication.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_event_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-03",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-03",
      "title": "DHL prepares prospect data for logistics solution design",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party press release",
      "source_url": "https://group.dhl.com/content/dam/deutschepostdhl/en/media-relations/press-releases/2024/pr-dsc-implements-genai-20241024.pdf",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Data formats",
        "Cleaning rules",
        "Human validation procedure",
        "Independent outcome measurements",
        "Cleaning can remove meaningful variation; domain-specific interpretation remains necessary."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2024-10-24",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://group.dhl.com/content/dam/deutschepostdhl/en/media-relations/press-releases/2024/pr-dsc-implements-genai-20241024.pdf",
        "evidence_note": "Release dateline states Bonn, October 24, 2024; treated as release publication date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_release_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-04",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-04",
      "title": "DHL turns booking correspondence into shipment records",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party investor presentation",
      "source_url": "https://group.dhl.com/content/dam/deutschepostdhl/de/media-center/investors/documents/capital-markets-days/DHL-Group-DGFF-Capital-Market-Briefing-London-March-2026.pdf",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Validation coverage",
        "Error rates",
        "Production scope",
        "Customer-rule implementation",
        "Parsing accuracy and permission to write to the destination system must be separately established."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2026-03-31",
        "other_date_type": "presentation_event_date",
        "evidence_url": "https://group.dhl.com/content/dam/deutschepostdhl/de/media-center/investors/documents/capital-markets-days/DHL-Group-DGFF-Capital-Market-Briefing-London-March-2026.pdf",
        "evidence_note": "Cover and slide 13 identify Capital Market Briefing, London, 31 March 2026. This is the presentation date; upload/publication date not established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_event_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-05",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-05",
      "title": "Walmart prioritizes overnight stocking work for shift leads",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party press release",
      "source_url": "https://corporate.walmart.com/news/2025/06/24/walmart-unveils-new-ai-powered-tools-to-empower-1-5-million-associates?source=Linkedin&trk=test",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Planning constraints",
        "Manager override rules",
        "Task completion feedback",
        "Quality or workload effects",
        "Labor fairness, workload and coverage must be evaluated; faster planning is not sufficient evidence of better plans."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-06-24",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://corporate.walmart.com/news/2025/06/24/walmart-unveils-new-ai-powered-tools-to-empower-1-5-million-associates?source=Linkedin&trk=test",
        "evidence_note": "News release header and dateline both state June 24, 2025.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_release_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-06",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-06",
      "title": "IKEA reallocates routine enquiry work toward remote advice",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party operating report",
      "source_url": "https://www.ingka.com/newsroom/ai-and-remote-selling-bring-ikea-design-expertise-to-the-many/?trk=public_post_comment-text",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Handoff mechanics",
        "Consultation steps",
        "Job-change distribution",
        "Causal effect of chatbot on sales",
        "Capacity released does not automatically become useful advisory work; training and demand must exist."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2023-06-29",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.ingka.com/newsroom/ai-and-remote-selling-bring-ikea-design-expertise-to-the-many/?trk=public_post_comment-text",
        "evidence_note": "Page displays 2023-06-29 without separately labeling publication versus update.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-07",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-07",
      "title": "Hilton Tokyo Bay uses waste evidence to revise preparation and purchasing",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party operating report",
      "source_url": "https://stories.hilton.com/apac/releases/savoring-sustainability-hotels-in-asia-pacific-tackling-food-waste",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Baseline comparability",
        "Waste recognition accuracy",
        "Decision cadence",
        "Independent savings verification",
        "Waste reduction must not compromise service quality or safety; causal attribution requires a comparison."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2024-08-15",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://stories.hilton.com/apac/releases/savoring-sustainability-hotels-in-asia-pacific-tackling-food-waste",
        "evidence_note": "News Releases header displays August 15, 2024; no separate update history established.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-08",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-08",
      "title": "East of England Co-op connects expiry predictions to shelf execution",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Pricer customer case study; trade coverage and supplier reports repeat related promotional claims, not separately established practitioner evidence.",
      "source_relationship": "Vendor case study with named customer staff testimony",
      "source_url": "https://www.pricer.com/case-studies/saving-meals-east-of-england-co-op-scales-sustainability-with-pricer-esls",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [
        {
          "url": "https://retailtechinnovationhub.squarespace.com/home/2025/5/14/east-of-england-co-op-saved-18-million-meals-from-landfill-in-2024-thanks-to-retail-insight-partnership",
          "relationship": "Trade article repeats customer/supplier quotations and partnership announcement.",
          "assessment": "Reject as independent practitioner validation: no separately conducted trial or firsthand operating account established.",
          "source_date": "2025-05-14",
          "source_date_type": "displayed_publication_date",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": false,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": "2025-05-14",
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": null,
            "other_date_type": null,
            "evidence_url": "https://retailtechinnovationhub.squarespace.com/home/2025/5/14/east-of-england-co-op-saved-18-million-meals-from-landfill-in-2024-thanks-to-retail-insight-partnership",
            "evidence_note": "Displayed date read in original page. No separate update date established.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        }
      ],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Expiry data provenance",
        "Model criteria",
        "Override behavior",
        "Independent validation of savings and accuracy",
        "Reliable item identity and synchronized downstream records matter as much as the recommendation.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2026-06-08",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.pricer.com/case-studies/saving-meals-east-of-england-co-op-scales-sustainability-with-pricer-esls",
        "evidence_note": "Page displays 2026-06-08 without separately labeling publication versus update.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-09",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-09",
      "title": "Singapore General Hospital reconciles daily service charges with exceptions",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party staff interviews",
      "source_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/singapore-health/enhancing-patient-care-operations",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Error ascertainment method",
        "Reconciliation coverage",
        "Exception frequency",
        "System controls",
        "Automation of payment or billing still needs domain-specific authorization and dispute handling."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2024-01-10",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/singapore-health/enhancing-patient-care-operations",
        "evidence_note": "Page displays 2024-01-10 without separately labeling publication versus update.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-10",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-10",
      "title": "Singapore General Hospital turns fragmented bill enquiries into one service",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party staff interview",
      "source_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/Lighternotes/digital-first-counter-less-strategy-takes-shape-in-sgh",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Resolution time",
        "Escalation paths",
        "Patient satisfaction",
        "Exact template",
        "One contact point needs actual cross-domain competence; centralizing a queue alone can create bottlenecks."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2021-05-31",
        "other_date_type": "displayed_article_date_type_unspecified",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.singhealth.com.sg/news/Lighternotes/digital-first-counter-less-strategy-takes-shape-in-sgh",
        "evidence_note": "Page displays 2021-05-31 without separately labeling publication versus update.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date_type_unspecified"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-11",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-11",
      "title": "NHS referral support follows provider-choice requests to a status report",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Arden & GEM service-provider showcase promotes its RPA delivery to an NHS client; named staff testimony inside that showcase is not independent client corroboration.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party staff-backed case study",
      "source_url": "https://www.ardengemcsu.nhs.uk/showcase/case-studies/case-studies/deploying-rpa-to-streamline-the-referral-management-process-for-an-nhs-waiting-list-and-referral-service/",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Dates",
        "Escalation rules",
        "Inconsistent source accuracy claims: eliminated errors versus 98% design target",
        "Contact consent, accessibility, and deadlines are context-specific; the legacy closure rule should not be blindly transferred.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.ardengemcsu.nhs.uk/showcase/case-studies/case-studies/deploying-rpa-to-streamline-the-referral-management-process-for-an-nhs-waiting-list-and-referral-service/",
        "evidence_note": "No publication or update date established in retrieved text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "not_stated_in_retrieved_page"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XOPS-12",
      "canonical_id": "XOPS-12",
      "title": "Mayo Clinic converts referral documents into a reviewed cover sheet",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "First-party staff interviews",
      "source_url": "https://mayomagazine.mayoclinic.org/2026/06/accelerating-hope/",
      "original_input": "expansion/nonsoftware-operations.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Exact extracted fields",
        "Review rubric",
        "Error and omission rates",
        "Page publication date",
        "Compression can hide consequential omissions; the original packet and qualified review remain necessary."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2024-07",
        "other_date_type": "reported_system_launch_month",
        "evidence_url": "https://mayomagazine.mayoclinic.org/2026/06/accelerating-hope/",
        "evidence_note": "Body explicitly states July 2024 launch. URL includes 2026/06 but no displayed publication date was established; URL date is not promoted to publication metadata.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:15:00Z",
        "status": "verified_event_date_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-01",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-01",
      "title": "Barefoot turns shared practice into co-authored guidance",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organizational or practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://www.barefootguide.org/our-story",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Independent reader outcomes",
        "How disagreement was resolved",
        "Co-authorship needs trust and genuine influence, not just solicited comments."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "6/5/2017",
        "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.barefootguide.org/our-story",
        "evidence_note": "Page displays 6/5/2017, ambiguous day/month order. Narrative names 2006 workshops and 2007 publication; neither is the page publication date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984838+00:00",
        "status": "ambiguous_displayed_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-02",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-02",
      "title": "Greenville Arts Council adapts prior proposals under deadline",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "OpenAI-published nonprofit grant success story; OpenAI’s own LinkedIn post is the same promotional account, not independent social evidence.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organizational or practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://academy.openai.com/en/public/blogs/twelve-minutes-to-fund-the-arts",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/openai-global-affairs_chatgpt-is-helping-the-greenville-arts-council-activity-7359197248666144768-97bh",
          "relationship": "OpenAI Global Affairs is the same AI vendor.",
          "assessment": "Reject: vendor’s own social retelling of the same story; exact post date unverified.",
          "source_date": null,
          "source_date_type": "unknown",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": false,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": null,
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": null,
            "other_date_type": "unknown",
            "evidence_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/openai-global-affairs_chatgpt-is-helping-the-greenville-arts-council-activity-7359197248666144768-97bh",
            "evidence_note": "Exact publication/update date not established; relative/indexed date not promoted.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        }
      ],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Prompt",
        "Fact-checking",
        "Privacy controls",
        "Independent verification of award claim",
        "Previous success does not establish eligibility or factual fit for another call.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2026-01-05",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://academy.openai.com/en/public/blogs/twelve-minutes-to-fund-the-arts",
        "evidence_note": "Article displays 2026-01-05. No updated date observed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984858+00:00",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-03",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-03",
      "title": "CBI reflects on sustaining legitimate community dialogue",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Practitioner reflection supports reported episodes and method considerations, not a single ordered workflow or tested intervention.",
      "source_relationship": "Practitioner reflection across multiple facilitation engagements, with recommendations and illustrative reported episodes",
      "source_url": "https://www.cbi.org/article/past-as-present/",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Comparative effectiveness",
        "Complete case chronology",
        "Which recommended practices co-occurred in any one engagement",
        "Actual sequence and outcomes for individual engagements",
        "A transactional facilitation template may reproduce the power imbalance it intends to resolve."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2019-03-14",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.cbi.org/article/past-as-present/",
        "evidence_note": "Article displays 2019-03-14. No updated date observed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:20:26.510992+00:00",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-04",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-04",
      "title": "UCA develops a shared digital strategy through flexible workshops",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Jisc service-provider story has additional client-side practitioner corroboration in an EUNIS paper; usable only as a process reference with the dependency disclosed.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organizational or practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://www.jisc.ac.uk/case-studies/using-consultancy-to-enable-digital-transformation",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [
        {
          "url": "https://easychair.org/publications/paper/4TZv/open",
          "relationship": "Jim Nottingham is UCA’s Information and Digital Services Director and Jisc member; coauthor Paula McIver Nottingham is a Middlesex academic. Client-side publication, not independent evaluation.",
          "assessment": "EUNIS 2025 paper describes stakeholder interviews/workshops, approved strategy and problems in earlier change. Draws partly on Jisc research and cites the vendor case, so corroboration is limited to participant-reported process and practical learning.",
          "source_date": "2025",
          "source_date_type": "printed_proceedings_year",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": true,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": null,
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": "2025",
            "other_date_type": "printed_proceedings_year",
            "evidence_url": "https://easychair.org/publications/paper/4TZv/open",
            "evidence_note": "PDF page 1 states EPiC Series in Computing volume 107, 2025; day/month publication and update unknown.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        }
      ],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "limited_client_practitioner_corroboration",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Long-term implementation results",
        "Dissent handling",
        "Consultation alone does not prove implementation or genuine power sharing.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2025-01-14",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.jisc.ac.uk/case-studies/using-consultancy-to-enable-digital-transformation",
        "evidence_note": "Article displays 2025-01-14. No updated date observed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984873+00:00",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-05",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-05",
      "title": "Oxford interprets anonymized staff survey feedback with AI",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organizational or practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/survey-analysis-and-insight-with-copilot-and-gemini",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Accuracy measures",
        "Publication date",
        "Adoption of proposed communications uses",
        "Anonymization and minority-view preservation require substantive judgment."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/survey-analysis-and-insight-with-copilot-and-gemini",
        "evidence_note": "No publication or update date observed in accessible article text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984877+00:00",
        "status": "unknown_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-06",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-06",
      "title": "Oxford grants staff co-design internal tools with ChatGPT",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organizational or practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/generative-ai-as-a-design-partner-for-process-improvement",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Independent time measurements",
        "Test coverage",
        "Deployment controls",
        "A plausible design explanation does not establish security or production readiness."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://oerc.ox.ac.uk/ai-centre/ai-in-professional-services-case-studies/generative-ai-as-a-design-partner-for-process-improvement",
        "evidence_note": "No publication or update date observed in accessible article text.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984882+00:00",
        "status": "unknown_publication_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-07",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-07",
      "title": "Orange localizes manga through AI and editorial craft",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Anthropic-published Orange customer story; independent practitioner evidence of this localization workflow’s quality/usefulness was not established.",
      "source_relationship": "Vendor-mediated customer account published by Anthropic",
      "source_url": "https://claude.com/customers/orange",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Independent quality assessment",
        "Detailed QA rules",
        "Publication date on article",
        "Independent corroboration of the vendor-mediated account",
        "Literal correctness alone cannot establish an equivalent artistic experience.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2025-02-21",
        "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.anthropic.com/customers",
        "evidence_note": "Article itself is undated in accessible text. Anthropic customer directory indexed Feb 21, 2025; retained only as provisional directory evidence, not verified article date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:20:26.510972+00:00",
        "status": "provisional_original_directory_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-08",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-08",
      "title": "La Cadera de Eva connects editorial signals with audience judgment",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Organization/practitioner describes its own work, rather than selling the featured tool; retain as reported practice with evidence limits, not measured effectiveness.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organizational or practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/from-intuition-to-intelligence-building-a-data-driven-newsroom-tool",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Recommendation accuracy",
        "Effect on coverage diversity",
        "Publication year",
        "Popularity is not a substitute for public-interest judgment."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "17 Mar",
        "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/from-intuition-to-intelligence-building-a-data-driven-newsroom-tool",
        "evidence_note": "Article displays 17 Mar without a year. Search relative publication metadata is not used to invent a full date.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984891+00:00",
        "status": "partial_displayed_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-09",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-09",
      "title": "A journalist develops a narrative-game storytelling prototype",
      "eligible": true,
      "source_category": "firsthand_creator_build_or_practice",
      "reason": "Participant account supports a prototype and mentor/peer feedback, not public deployment, audience impact or independently evaluated usefulness.",
      "source_relationship": "Original organizational or practitioner account",
      "source_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/gaming-the-censors-a-new-way-to-tell-chinas-untold-stories",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_required_for_process_reference",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Exact AI tools and tasks",
        "Actual reach",
        "Reader safety evaluation",
        "Publication year",
        "A compelling prototype does not prove safe distribution or audience reach."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "process_reference_with_explicit_limits",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "31 Mar",
        "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.journalismai.info/blog/gaming-the-censors-a-new-way-to-tell-chinas-untold-stories",
        "evidence_note": "Article displays 31 Mar without a year. No full publication date inferred.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:17:07.984895+00:00",
        "status": "partial_displayed_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-10",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-10",
      "title": "TRY reports creative-strategy applications of Claude",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Anthropic customer story; TRY’s own publicity is not independent corroboration because TRY explicitly markets Anthropic implementation/training services as its partner.",
      "source_relationship": "Vendor-mediated customer account published by Anthropic",
      "source_url": "https://claude.com/customers/try",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [
        {
          "url": "https://try.no/artikler/kristine-rullet-ut-claude-i-try-investeringen-har-gitt-betydelig-avkastning-allerede",
          "relationship": "TRY is the featured customer and an Anthropic implementation/training partner.",
          "assessment": "Reject as independent corroboration; explicitly discloses commercial partnership.",
          "source_date": "2025-05-28",
          "source_date_type": "displayed_publication_date",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": false,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": "2025-05-28",
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": null,
            "other_date_type": null,
            "evidence_url": "https://try.no/artikler/kristine-rullet-ut-claude-i-try-investeringen-har-gitt-betydelig-avkastning-allerede",
            "evidence_note": "Displayed date read in original page. No separate update date established.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        }
      ],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Exact prompts",
        "Meaning of concept testing",
        "Independent outcome measures",
        "Independent corroboration of the vendor-mediated account",
        "Whether these applications form one sequence",
        "Any hypotheses, comparison conditions, observations or outcome measurements behind concept testing",
        "Model agreement or fluency is not market validation.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2025-05-28",
        "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note",
        "evidence_url": "https://www.anthropic.com/customers",
        "evidence_note": "Accessible article is undated. Original Anthropic customer directory indexed May 28, 2025; not independently confirmed on article.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:20:26.510984+00:00",
        "status": "provisional_original_directory_date"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-11",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-11",
      "title": "Audience Strategies links interview synthesis to cultural advocacy",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "vendor_customer_or_product_promotional_story",
      "reason": "Anthropic customer story; employee LinkedIn promotion explicitly links the same jointly publicized case and does not constitute independent corroboration.",
      "source_relationship": "Vendor-mediated customer account published by Anthropic",
      "source_url": "https://claude.com/customers/audience-strategies",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/richard-bowman-026a9871_audience-strategies-expands-the-electronic-activity-7345510670441832448-HMWp",
          "relationship": "Audience Strategies colleagues Richard Bowman and David Boyle promote their Anthropic case study.",
          "assessment": "Reject as independent corroboration: social endorsement of the same case, no separately inspectable underlying comparison. Page date is relative, exact publication date unverified.",
          "source_date": null,
          "source_date_type": "unknown",
          "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
          "accepted_as_corroboration": false,
          "source_dates": {
            "published": null,
            "updated": null,
            "other_date": null,
            "other_date_type": "unknown",
            "evidence_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/posts/richard-bowman-026a9871_audience-strategies-expands-the-electronic-activity-7345510670441832448-HMWp",
            "evidence_note": "Exact publication/update date not established; relative/indexed date not promoted.",
            "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00"
          }
        }
      ],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Independent verification of influence",
        "Interview consent procedures",
        "Publication date",
        "Independent corroboration of the vendor-mediated account",
        "Stakeholder attention is not proof of causal policy impact.",
        "An employee quote, social repost, partner endorsement, likes/views, or syndicated story does not independently corroborate the vendor claim."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": null,
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": "2025",
        "other_date_type": "Displayed partial date or event date; see note",
        "evidence_url": "https://claude.com/customers/audience-strategies",
        "evidence_note": "No article date observed. Body mentions the 2025 project; that is a project reference, not article publication.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:20:26.510987+00:00",
        "status": "event_year_only"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "XCRE-12",
      "canonical_id": "XCRE-12",
      "title": "A consultancy reframes an agency’s fee negotiation problem",
      "eligible": false,
      "source_category": "sponsored_or_uncertain_lead",
      "reason": "Consultant’s anonymous-client diagnosis and offered intervention; no verified delivery, adopted process or outcome. Not an observed workflow reference.",
      "source_relationship": "Consultancy practitioner account of diagnosis and offered intervention services for an unnamed agency",
      "source_url": "https://www.cbi.org/article/when-individual-bargaining-skills-aren-t-enough/",
      "original_input": "expansion/creative-relationship-cases.json",
      "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:26:44.526806+00:00",
      "corroboration_links": [],
      "independent_corroboration_status": "not_established",
      "evidence_constraints": [
        "Eligibility, where granted, permits a process reference only; it is not proof of usefulness, causal effectiveness, safety, or transferability.",
        "No workflow software executed, no video playback independently observed, and no outcomes independently measured by this audit.",
        "Client identity",
        "Implementation detail",
        "Financial results",
        "Whether offered services were delivered",
        "Which contract or preparation changes were adopted",
        "Whether a feedback loop operated in practice",
        "The account does not establish that revised contract options were implemented or improved outcomes.",
        "Exclusion is an evidence/provenance decision, not a finding that the technique cannot work."
      ],
      "effectiveness_proven": false,
      "allowed_use": "audit_and_exclusion_register_only",
      "eligible_for_success_highlight": false,
      "enrichment_reviewed": false,
      "source_dates": {
        "published": "2007-04-02",
        "updated": null,
        "other_date": null,
        "other_date_type": null,
        "evidence_url": "https://www.cbi.org/article/when-individual-bargaining-skills-aren-t-enough/",
        "evidence_note": "Article displays 2007-04-02. No updated date observed.",
        "checked_at": "2026-10-18T03:20:26.510997+00:00",
        "status": "verified_displayed_date"
      }
    }
  ],
  "enrichment_reconciliation_note": "All six enriched IDs checked for obsolete inherited constraints. Removed SOC01 community-only template restriction and SOC06 failed-transcript restriction; added current evidence/date entries. Eligibility and counts unchanged."
}